Because it is extremely well-understood, handles a lot of the
reliability needs itself, and nothing more is required for the
application.
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 7:02 PM, ChingShen chingshenc...@gmail.com wrote:
Why? What reasons did you choose TCP?
Shen
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 9:15 AM,
Why? What reasons did you choose TCP?
Shen
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 9:15 AM, Jonathan Ellis jbel...@gmail.com wrote:
In 0.6 gossip is over TCP.
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 6:54 PM, Ashwin Jayaprakash
ashwin.jayaprak...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey guys! I have a simple question. I'm a casual observer,
Or, use OpenPGM (http://code.google.com/p/openpgm/) as an alternative? But
they don't have any Java bindings yet.
ZeroMQ (http://www.zeromq.org/) uses this.
--
View this message in context:
http://n2.nabble.com/Unreliable-transport-layer-tp4684470p4814206.html
Sent from the cassandra-u
