On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Robert Coli wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Piavlo wrote:
>
>> I can't understand how statistically it's possible that with random
>> partitioner some nodes have x2 more keys than others with 50-100 millions
>> of keys per node.
>>
>
> 1) you have very
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Piavlo wrote:
> I can't understand how statistically it's possible that with random
> partitioner some nodes have x2 more keys than others with 50-100 millions
> of keys per node.
>
1) you have very high row variance and really really bad luck with the
distributi
Hi,
There is a 12 node cluster , still stuck on 1.0.8.
All nodes in the cluster ring are balanced.
Using random partitioner.
All CFs use compression.
Data size on nodes varies from 40G to 75G.
This variance is not due to the bigger nodes having more uncompacted
sstables than others.
Most bigges
