that one's done for 0.8.1: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-2280
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 5:56 AM, Peter Schuller
wrote:
>> I just found Cassandra-2698 (I thought I had seen something about this)...
>
> There is also the other bug that causes repair to transfer data from
> all CF:s
> I just found Cassandra-2698 (I thought I had seen something about this)...
There is also the other bug that causes repair to transfer data from
all CF:s rather than just the one being repaired. This could be
affecting you if you're doing repair of individual CF:s rather than
everything at the sa
Ah..
I just found Cassandra-2698 (I thought I had seen something about this)...
I guess that means I have too see if I can find time to investigate if I
have a reproducible case?
Terje
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Terje Marthinussen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have been testing repairs a bit in di
Hi,
I have been testing repairs a bit in different ways on 0.8.0 and I am
curious on what to really expect in terms of data transferred.
I would expect my data to be fairly consistent in this case from the start.
More than a billion supercolumns, but there was no errors in feed and we
have seen m
