I am using commons-net FTPClient utility to transfer files, sizes upto 50MB.
When i try to transfer the file using the command prompt, the file transfers
in 5 seconds. But when i use the FTPClient Utility, it takes about 1 minute.
I set the BufferSize etc to about 8MB, but the result is the same.
On 12/10/07, Shawn Garner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Is there a way to declare a global state transition?
>
>
>
Not in the way you have above (I understand that was only for
clarifying intent). But, there are atleast two ways to achieve this.
Say, you have foo.xml as follows:
On 12/8/07, Sudeep Gandhe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I tried the following scxml file with the StandaloneJexlExpressions. I don't
> get the correct value for "Data(d, '//tar/@name')". Can you explain, what's
> wrong ?
>
We use some Xalan APIs internally to be able to resolve prefixes in
XPath
Jörg,
Do you have any code snippets for these examples?
Mark
On Dec 10, 2007 5:59 AM, Jörg Schaible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> can somebody explain the following numbers - especially why FTP is that
> dead slow compared to SFTP handling a lot of files? I measure a simple copy
> action
Hi,
can somebody explain the following numbers - especially why FTP is that dead
slow compared to SFTP handling a lot of files? I measure a simple copy action
of a directory containing some few files:
FTP
* Initia
Hi,
Actually I already have a solution that works (i.e. I have some sort of
executable XML which has the needed logic), however, for me it is very
important to answer the question, would it be better to refactor that
solution in the way that it would use Jelly.
What I have is an engine (coinc
Hi,
It would be appreciated if you could follow these conventions:
(1) Please do not use all-capitals for an email subject. IT IS ANNOYING AND
HARD TO READ.
(2) When using the commons list, put the component name at the start of the
subject line, eg
[digester] ... because this email list i
High I'm using DIGESTER to parse an xml doc but it seems that I don't
understang somethig
My xml file:
690504
AM
Evaldas,
the jelly script is loaded in memory then the doTag methods are called.
So, of course, it could not scale to kilometers of source, but,
indeed, then a fancy branching logic of doTag is doable.
hope it helps.
paul
Le 10 déc. 07 à 09:42, Evaldas Taroza a écrit :
Hi,
Yes, I think I
Hi,
Yes, I think I would need to implement something similar to the thread
taglib. Because I will need something like:
1. There is a dedicated thread for every tag
2. Some threads are blocked by other threads (waiting to end)
3. Unblocked threads can run
I haven't looked deep into Jelly yet, no
10 matches
Mail list logo
