Hi,
I defined a bean:
public class MyBean {
private String property1;
public String getProperty1 () { return this.property1; }
public void setProperty1 (String property1) { this.property1 =
property1; } }
And, when I call following on 'MyBean';
...
MyBean mybean = new My
Wes Clark wrote:
> I am using the latest stable release of DBCP, 1.2.2, but an older
> version of Pool, 1.2. I see there are several new versions of Pool
> release, the latest being 1.5.3. Is there a dependency between DBCP and
> Pool?
Yes, DBCP depends on pool.
Can I or should I upgrade to
The Commons DbUtils team is pleased to announce the commons-dbutils-1.3
release!
DbUtils is a package of Java utility classes for easing JDBC development.
Changes in this version include:
New features:
o Java 1.5 generics and varargs Issue: DBUTILS-48.
Fixed Bugs:
o Fixed error message in
I am using the latest stable release of DBCP, 1.2.2, but an older
version of Pool, 1.2. I see there are several new versions of Pool
release, the latest being 1.5.3. Is there a dependency between DBCP and
Pool? Can I or should I upgrade to latest version of Pool?
The commons-exec-team is pleased to announce the commons-exec-1.0.1.jar
release!
A library to reliably execute external processes from within the JVM
Changes in this version include:
Fixed Bugs:
o On a Mac, the unit tests never finish. Culprit is InputStreamPumper which
sets its stop member in t
Marc,
I used the following to track down a connection leak when using an older
version of DBCP. I have not used it with later versions but I believe
some of the DBCP methods seen here have been removed. This method was
called after each call to open() and we saw the number of active
connecti
But in my view, connection leak means, i am not closing SQL
connections
(apart form the fact that i checked this) but then these connections
would be "in use" by the pool and also "in use" by the the server
jobs
that hold the connections. But thats not the case.
The "server jobs" may have
Marc Logemann wrote:
>
>
>
>>> because as i said, there a 3 of 30 DB connections active on the DB
>>> Server.
>>
>> Which indicates that you likely have a connection leak.
>>
>
>
> But in my view, connection leak means, i am not closing SQL connections
> (apart form the fact that i checked thi
because as i said, there a 3 of 30 DB connections active on the DB
Server.
Which indicates that you likely have a connection leak.
But in my view, connection leak means, i am not closing SQL
connections (apart form the fact that i checked this) but then these
connections would be "in
Marc Logemann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> its a deadlock as also Cyrille pointed out.
No, it isn't.
> There is no exhaustion
Yes there is. Look at the source code for the line you quoted:
at
org.apache.commons.pool.impl.GenericObjectPool.borrowObject(GenericObjectPool.java:810)
That is the wait() call i
Hi,
I had similar issue (probably due to
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DBCP-44).
You have to upgrade commons-pool version.
--
Olivier
2009/11/12 James Carman :
> That's the version of commons-dbcp (which is current). What version
> of commons-pool are you using?
>
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2009
I was hoping to get a version with the fix to VFS-120 .
When is VFA 2.0 projected to be released?
Mark Ayasse, VFA
-Original Message-
From: Ralph Goers [mailto:ralph.go...@dslextreme.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 1:04 PM
To: Commons Users List
Subject: Re: VFS: Release 1.1
O
Marc Logemann wrote:
> Uh sorry, misread that. Commons-pool is at 1.3. As i said, i am using
> ivy/maven to resolve that stuff and since i am not explicitely grabbing
> commons-pool, 1.3 was pushed in because of dependency definition of
> commons-dhcp 1.2.2
I don't see a deadlock in the thread du
Uh sorry, misread that. Commons-pool is at 1.3. As i said, i am using
ivy/maven to resolve that stuff and since i am not explicitely
grabbing commons-pool, 1.3 was pushed in because of dependency
definition of commons-dhcp 1.2.2
---
regards
Marc Logemann
http://www.logemann.org
http://www
That's the version of commons-dbcp (which is current). What version
of commons-pool are you using?
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 4:11 AM, Marc Logemann wrote:
> Uhh forgot mention this. Seems i am using 1.2.2 ... quite old isnt it? I am
> using Maven Central for JAR management and 1.2.2 is the latest
Uhh forgot mention this. Seems i am using 1.2.2 ... quite old isnt it?
I am using Maven Central for JAR management and 1.2.2 is the latest
over there. Is there a better repository for Commons-DBCP somewhere?
---
regards
Marc Logemann
http://www.logemann.org
http://www.logentis.de
Am 12.1
Hi,
which version of common_pool are you using ?
there is a synchronization issue on 1.3 version, which has been fixed on 1.4
See
http://www.docjar.com/html/api/org/apache/commons/pool/impl/GenericObjectPool.java.html
or get the source
1.4 source
911 public Object borrowObject() throws
Hi,
we are facing some deadlocks in production situation with DBCP. We
analyzed it a bit and even though there are way much lower connections
than the pool should be able to handle (real DB sessions on db server
= 3, maxActive in DBCP defined as 30) DBCP is not giving back any more
connec
18 matches
Mail list logo
