Re: [scxml] Transitions without targets compete for enablement

Thanks Rahul for the answer. Comments below: You're correct that in this case both (or more than two) transitions could be selected. The selection process in v0.9 picks the first transition in document order (from each orthogonal region, if there are such regions) without inspecting the

[scxml] update datamodel from Java

I came across this one in the archive and would like to comment: A simple implementation would reevalute all events without and event attribute, a better implemention may ask the script engine which expression depends on what. Indeed. We cater to a number of expression languages and if

Re: [scxml] Transitions without targets compete for enablement

On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 4:35 AM, Hallvard Trætteberg h...@idi.ntnu.no wrote: Thanks Rahul for the answer. Comments below:  You're correct that in this case both (or more than two) transitions  could be selected. The selection process in v0.9 picks the first  transition in document order