Re: [CLI] - withValueSeparator() usage

2013-02-03 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On 02/03/2013 06:29 PM, Greg Thomas wrote: > I've had a look; I the only place that could do with clarification is > the javadoc for getOptionValues @ > http://commons.apache.org/cli/api-release/org/apache/commons/cli/CommandLine.html#getOptionValues(java.lang.String) > / > http://commons.apache.o

Re: [fileupload]java.io.fileNotFoundException : /home/abc/xyz.jpg (Permission denied)

2013-02-03 Thread Sven Johansson
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 5:23 PM, arvind viswanathan < arvind.viswanat...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > I am running tomcat7 instance in amazon linux. I am encountering the above > message when using file upload in my application deployed in it. I get the > following message. > java.io.fileNotFoundExce

Re: [math] Problem using the LevenbergMarquardtOptimizer

2013-02-03 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On 02/02/2013 12:24 PM, Gilles wrote: > Hello. > >> Dear all, >> I'm using the commons math library for solving least-squares problems >> using the LevenbergMarquardtOptimizer. >> I have a problem when I specify bounds for the estimation (by means >> of a SimpleBounds object). I don't understand w

Re: [math] Problem using the LevenbergMarquardtOptimizer

2013-02-03 Thread Ted Dunning
The key distinction here is that there are two situations. - the first is where suggestions are ignored. For instance, a clustering algorithm that ignored initial cluster locations or an optimizer that ignores an initial data point. These behaviors should be documented, but ignoring these sugges

Re: [CLI] - withValueSeparator() usage

2013-02-03 Thread Greg Thomas
I've had a look; I the only place that could do with clarification is the javadoc for getOptionValues @ http://commons.apache.org/cli/api-release/org/apache/commons/cli/CommandLine.html#getOptionValues(java.lang.String) / http://commons.apache.org/cli/api-release/org/apache/commons/cli/CommandLine

Re: [math] Problem using the LevenbergMarquardtOptimizer

2013-02-03 Thread luca . marchetti
Dear Gilles, thank you for the very complete answer. This finally solves the question I raised! As a developer, I understand why you chose to maintain a simple API.  Despite this, I agree with you that, at the moment, the situation is quite confusing. As you suggested, a simple solution can be to