Re: [configuration2]: AbstractConfiguration::getArray

Hi Jörg, Am 28.04.2016 um 16:34 schrieb Jörg Schaible: > Chas Honton wrote: > >> Try casting Object[] to long[]. The compiler and the runtime will >> complain. > > It is not about a cast, it's about returning the proper object. And it has > nothing to do with primitives, because you cannot

Re: [configuration2]: AbstractConfiguration::getArray

Chas Honton wrote: > Try casting Object[] to long[]. The compiler and the runtime will > complain. It is not about a cast, it's about returning the proper object. And it has nothing to do with primitives, because you cannot cast e.g. Object[] to String[] either. > >> On Apr 27, 2016, at

Re: [configuration2]: AbstractConfiguration::getArray

Try casting Object[] to long[]. The compiler and the runtime will complain. > On Apr 27, 2016, at 11:59 PM, Jörg Schaible > wrote: > > Hi Oliver, > > Oliver Heger wrote: > >> Hi Rainer, >> >>> Am 27.04.2016 um 21:22 schrieb Rainer Hirschmiller: >>> Hi. >>>

Re: [configuration2]: AbstractConfiguration::getArray

Hi Oliver, Oliver Heger wrote: > Hi Rainer, > > Am 27.04.2016 um 21:22 schrieb Rainer Hirschmiller: >> Hi. >> >> I wonder why AbstractConfiguration::getArray(cls, key) returns a single >> object, not an array of objects? Can somebody explain why the caller >> have to make an explicit cast? >>