Re: [scxml] looking for developer for adaptations on Commons SCXML

2017-11-30 Thread mike shugar
Hi Martin, It sounds like you want a discrete event simulation with script implemented as a large population of state machines. Are you able to post more details about your simulation requirements? You may be able to achieve them with a different simulation approach or tool. For example, - do

Re: [beanutils] JVM problem with BeanIntrospectionData.getWriteMethod()

2017-11-30 Thread Martin Gainty
From: robertlazarski . Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 9:28 AM To: Commons Users List Subject: [beanutils] JVM problem with BeanIntrospectionData.getWriteMethod() Hello all, We recently upgraded to commons beanutils 1.9.3 and are seeing this problem on our

Re: [scxml] looking for developer for adaptations on Commons SCXML

2017-11-30 Thread Martin Gainty
From: r.c.hoekstra Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2017 4:50 AM To: Commons Users List Subject: Re: [scxml] looking for developer for adaptations on Commons SCXML On 30-11-17 01:49, Woonsan Ko wrote: Hi Woonsan, I'll go through your comments in the text below. >

Re: [scxml] looking for developer for adaptations on Commons SCXML

2017-11-30 Thread r.c.hoekstra
On 30-11-17 01:49, Woonsan Ko wrote: Hi Woonsan, I'll go through your comments in the text below. On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 6:56 AM, r.c.hoekstra wrote: Hi List, We are working at the ErasmusMC hospital at Rotterdam, Netherlands, on scientific simulations on the spread of infectious diseases

Re: [scxml] looking for developer for adaptations on Commons SCXML

2017-11-30 Thread r.c.hoekstra
Hi Jake, thanks for your reaction. That is a really useful comparison. And I can see that Apache commons SCXML isn't doing that bad, though the scale is of course logarithmic. Unfortunately the benchmarking didn't test our use case: we need to fire up many instances of the same (relatively