RE: VFS LocalFile#getLocalFile() protected?
Hi! Not every FileObject can be represented as a local file, and thus getLocalFile ist protected. What you can do is to replicate the file: File file = fileObject.getFileSystem().replicateFile(fileObject, Selectors.SELECT_SELF); For the local filesystem this simply exposes the local file object (no real replication takes place). For any other file object, e.g. a reference to a file within a zip file real replication takes place and the file will be copied to a temporary place. Ciao, Mario -Original Message- From: Ryan McKinley [mailto:ryan...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, May 15, 2009 4:37 AM To: user@commons.apache.org Subject: VFS LocalFile#getLocalFile() protected? Is there any reason LocalFile#getLocalFile() is protected rather then public? Since the process to reconstruct a File object is kinda clunky, it would be nice to just have access directly to the file object. ryan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@commons.apache.org org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@commons.apache.org
Re: VFS LocalFile#getLocalFile() protected?
I wish I had asked sooner! that is perfect. thanks! On May 15, 2009, at 2:13 AM, Mario Ivankovits wrote: Hi! Not every FileObject can be represented as a local file, and thus getLocalFile ist protected. What you can do is to replicate the file: File file = fileObject.getFileSystem().replicateFile(fileObject, Selectors.SELECT_SELF); For the local filesystem this simply exposes the local file object (no real replication takes place). For any other file object, e.g. a reference to a file within a zip file real replication takes place and the file will be copied to a temporary place. Ciao, Mario -Original Message- From: Ryan McKinley [mailto:ryan...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, May 15, 2009 4:37 AM To: user@commons.apache.org Subject: VFS LocalFile#getLocalFile() protected? Is there any reason LocalFile#getLocalFile() is protected rather then public? Since the process to reconstruct a File object is kinda clunky, it would be nice to just have access directly to the file object. ryan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@commons.apache.org org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@commons.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@commons.apache.org
[Net] Whom to contact
Hi, The webpage http://commons.apache.org/ seems to lack information. I could not find contact information of any particular person/webmaster who is responsible for updating the webpage. Thefore I sent this email to this mailing list. Of course if this is the only way to contact the webmaster, that's fine... but it could still be more clearly stated on the webpage. First of all the nightly builds link on the download page of the Net component is not working. The page containing the link is: http://commons.apache.org/net/download.html Not working link leads to the following URL: http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-commons/nightly/commons-net/ I could find a nightly snapshot link from the main page http://commons.apache.org/ . The latest nightly snapshot of the Net component seems to be from 2007. I assume that nightly snapshots of the Net component are not provided anymore since the latest release in 2008 is more fresh than the last nightly snapshot I could find? Please correct me if I'm wrong and there is another location where to find the nightly snapshots. My last concern this time is the MDTM command. It throws an exception and it seems that there _commands array in the FTPCommand class is lacking the MDTM command, but since I have only the latest release build at hand I cannot verify if this has been already corrected or if a bug report should be filed? Br, Olli Loikkanen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@commons.apache.org
Re: [SCXML] new release, parameter handling
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 8:39 AM, Alexander Blotny alexander.blo...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote: Hi, I have some questions to the SCXML project. I am not sure if it is the right place, please tell me if it is not. snip/ This is the right place. At first I would like to know when the next release will come. I could not find any information on the page. snap/ In a few months (purposely vague since there is no set date yet). Furthermore I am curious if the next release will support EcmaScript as evaluation language or does already something like a plugin exist? snip/ Options [1][2] are being looked at. Since Commons SCXML has the notion of pluggable ELs [3], a new release isn't strictly needed to add support for a new EL though. As far as I can see the implementation does only support to execute void methods without parameters when a certain state is reached. I think it would be nice to have entry parameters and return values. So the results of one state/method can be used in another one. Maybe there is already a possibility but I missed it... snap/ I think this is about the AbstractStateMachine class, which is meant to be a simple example usage pattern. Adjust per taste, see user guide for details. -Rahul [1] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/scxml/branches/J6 (see oacs.env.javascript package) [2] http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCXML-108 [3] http://commons.apache.org/scxml/guide/contexts-evaluators.html Thank you in advance. greetings, Alex - To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@commons.apache.org
