Re: who to set up readers for databases

2010-05-19 Thread Bernhard Schauer
Thanks a lot for that hint, Martin. I have put together some notes of things, that were not obvious for me, when reading the mentioned article. Probable some one is interested in them, so I append them. (Note: the formatting is Track-Wiki-Syntax) MfG Bernhard ===

Re: write to compacting database

2010-05-19 Thread John Merrells
On May 19, 2010, at 6:55 PM, Randall Leeds wrote: > Might be hitting the maximum number of file descriptors. > You could bump this by using the ulimit command. You'll have to modify > your init script if you launch couch as a daemon that way. Just run > `ulimit -n ` before erlang starts. Go

Re: write to compacting database

2010-05-19 Thread Randall Leeds
Might be hitting the maximum number of file descriptors. You could bump this by using the ulimit command. You'll have to modify your init script if you launch couch as a daemon that way. Just run `ulimit -n ` before erlang starts.

changes filter written in erlang

2010-05-19 Thread Matthew Sinclair-Day
Hi. I'm looking for an example of a changes filter written in erlang that uses a query argument passed in the request. I looked on the wiki and did not see an example of the erlang function prototype. Thanks. Matt

Re: write to compacting database

2010-05-19 Thread John Merrells
On May 16, 2010, at 4:37 PM, Randall Leeds wrote: >> >> max_dbs_open = 100 >> >> and I have ~130 databases. Could that explain it? > > Easy way to test :) I have bumped this up, but I'm still getting period patches of 500's from couch. I still see the gen_server timeouts occurring, but I no

Re: who to set up readers for databases

2010-05-19 Thread Martin Higham
You'll find the information you are looking for on the wiki http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Security_Features_Overview On 19 May 2010 10:06, Bernhard Schauer wrote: > Hello, > > I want to set up a DB so that only one 'reader' (I think that is the > correct term) can read and write documents to

process error, exist status 137

2010-05-19 Thread Matthew Sinclair-Day
I've built couch 0.11.0 on Solaris 10 and am having problems with js views. When the view is run, the following error message is repeatedly written to the couch log until couch is shutdown: [Wed, 19 May 2010 19:45:54 GMT] [error] [<0.131.0>] OS Process Error <0.22346.0> :: {os_process_error,{

Re: Proxied CouchDB breaks continuous _changes

2010-05-19 Thread Benoit Chesneau
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 5:31 PM, Zachary Zolton wrote: > @Sebastian that's correct. I am however using this configuration and > everything seem to be working fine for me. As always, YMMV... > > Is having "proxy_buffering off;" for all paths really a bad thing? I > think you'd want that behavior, f

Replication Security

2010-05-19 Thread Norberto Fernandes FCS
Hi All, Does anyone know the protocol or security layer used by couchDB to replicate data? Is data being published from one database to the other over a security layer? or is it a simple http post? Thanks, Norberto

who to set up readers for databases

2010-05-19 Thread Bernhard Schauer
Hello, I want to set up a DB so that only one 'reader' (I think that is the correct term) can read and write documents to it. So far I only found documentation regarding, how to set up an admin account. But that is not what I want, since my reader should not be able to create or delete databas

Re: Proxied CouchDB breaks continuous _changes

2010-05-19 Thread Sebastian Cohnen
On 19.05.2010, at 18:37, Zachary Zolton wrote: >> I just wanted to point at a possible wiki edit :) It would be very nice if >> you could add a sentence or two to the wiki describing what the effect is >> and why you use these settings. > > I agree, but I missed the comment box last time. (^_^)

Re: Proxied CouchDB breaks continuous _changes

2010-05-19 Thread Zachary Zolton
> I just wanted to point at a possible wiki edit :) It would be very nice if > you could add a sentence or two to the wiki describing what the effect is and > why you use these settings. I agree, but I missed the comment box last time. (^_^) Perhaps it should be a required field. Is there an ea

Re: Proxied CouchDB breaks continuous _changes

2010-05-19 Thread Sebastian Cohnen
As I said before, I don't know nginx at all and therefore I also don't know the exact behavior of this setting. If it is a buffer, preventing streaming or chunked transfer encoding at all, I would say yes, you want this basically for all requests/paths. I just wanted to point at a possible wiki

Re: Proxied CouchDB breaks continuous _changes

2010-05-19 Thread Zachary Zolton
@Sebastian that's correct. I am however using this configuration and everything seem to be working fine for me. As always, YMMV... Is having "proxy_buffering off;" for all paths really a bad thing? I think you'd want that behavior, for instance, when send()'ing individual chunks from a _list funct

Re: _active_tasks

2010-05-19 Thread Jan Lehnardt
Hi Tom, _active_tasks doesn't have long poll or continuous options. Cheers Jan -- On 18 May 2010, at 19:06, Tom Sante wrote: > Hey, > Quick question. Can you request info from _active_tasks the same ways > (polling, continuous,..) as with _changes? or can I only have a script do > regular p