ink docs. I can't imagine how any DB could do this.
>
> On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 8:12 PM, Luca Matteis wrote:
>
>> Because my JSON file is generated programmatically.
>>
>> Ok basically I have a program that runs on my local computer that
>> generates data that
Because my JSON file is generated programmatically.
Ok basically I have a program that runs on my local computer that
generates data that I want to insert/modify to my Couch instance. So
my local data should be in synch with my cloud data... but i can't
install CouchDB locally... so how do I keep
Because my JSON file is generated programmatically.
Ok basically I have a program that runs on my local computer that
generates data that I want to insert/modify to my Couch instance. So
my local data should be in synch with my cloud data... but i can't
install CouchDB locally... so how do I keep
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 4:35 AM, Simon Metson wrote:
> Hi,
> Can't your program write to a local CouchDB instance instead of a file?
Right, the thing is that I can't install CouchDB on my local computer.
That's why I'm wondering if there's a simpler solution, but probably
not, right?
tly using futon, not change
> the original data.
>
> On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 6:35 PM, Luca Matteis wrote:
>
>> I have a file that contains lots of JSON documents - probably around
>> 1gb of data.
>> I uploaded this file to my server's Couch instance (on the cloud
I have a file that contains lots of JSON documents - probably around
1gb of data.
I uploaded this file to my server's Couch instance (on the cloud)
using the Bulk API.
Now I need to re-upload it because I've made some changes to the file
- I've added some documents, deleted some, and edited a few.
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Miles Fidelman
wrote:
> - what kinds of spatial data?
He's storing something called "missions". Basically the location
people have been to collect certain types of plants. So his data
contains lat-lng coordinates and some other information of the mission
(such as
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Dave Cottlehuber wrote:
> Not necessarily, you could easily export the 2GB file, massage it to
> filter out records already stored & current in CouchDB, and then
> push a _bulk_docs with the new ones.
But the couch is located somewhere online. To check if the reco
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Dave Cottlehuber wrote:
> The trite answer would be to rewrite the Access DB into Couch with a nice
> couchapp front end for your friend's local copy, & then summon replication
> to keep a public web version updated.
This is quite hard. My friend (colleague actual
Hello all,
I have a scenario where I'm working with a friend of mine that
maintains a bunch of spatial data in a MS Access database. I want to
put this data online, as a web-site, and allow people to query it
using an interface and a RESTful API. So I thought CouchDB + GeoCouch
would be perfect fo
obile Application Developer / Web Developer
>
>
>
> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 1:40 AM, Luca Matteis wrote:
>
>> I know this is also solved by putting some sort of firewall before
>> Couch. But these are little fixes and little things that could really
>> make writing couchapps a lot better.
r making things more clear for me.
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 8:40 AM, Luca Matteis wrote:
> Yes, people could get around the voting by simply using a proxy server
> or logging in from somewhere else. But the idea is that it makes it
> *harder* for people to vote based on their IP address.
>
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 8:28 AM, Jens Alfke wrote:
>
> On May 28, 2012, at 2:26 PM, Luca Matteis wrote:
>
> contained in the request), so why not give the IP address of the
> request as well? This would allow the creation of even more powerful
> Couchapps.
>
> The IP address is
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 11:52 PM, Paul Davis
wrote:
> This would be nice but not every replication request happens through
> the HTTP layer. Local replications have no notion of a request so I'm
> not sure what you'd put in there.
What is passed as userCtx for these cases?
t; be bypassed by a savvy user. I don't see why a validate_doc_update
> function couldn't enforce this it if had access to the req object. I'm
> +1.
>
> B.
>
> On 28 May 2012 16:06, Luca Matteis wrote:
>> Sure. For example I'm allowing my users to vote o
Sure. For example I'm allowing my users to vote on certain "items" in
my database. This will allow me to understand the amount of
satisfaction of these items. I can easily validate and make sure each
user is commenting only once, however, someone might simply create a
new account and re-vote for th
I have a scenario where I'm building a CouchApp that needs to deny
certain behavior from happening based on the user's IP address.
However, the request object isn't available in validate_doc_update()
functions.
Would it be good to consider this as a new feature to be implemented?
This would enable
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Keith Gable wrote:
> Integers as strings:
>
> ["1", "2", "3"]
>
> Integers as integers:
>
> [1, 2, 3]
Okay, but how does that help with the question at hand?
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 6:08 AM, Jim Klo wrote:
> I'm not sure I'm following the whole thread, but why are you storing integers
> as strings?
>
> If you store them as numbers, they would collate right I think.
Hi Jim,
Can you provide an example?
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 8:19 PM, Matthieu Rakotojaona
wrote:
> ["905"] // 905 points for post "1"
> ["1","36"] // 36 points for post "1/4"
> ["1","76"] // 76 points for post "1/2"
> ["1","2","14"] // 14 points for post "1/2/3"
> ["1","4","1"] // 1 point for post "1/4/6"
Okay but the new "1/4/6" c
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Matthieu Rakotojaona
wrote:
> You could emit the parent's path and the post's points, instead of the
> parent's path and the post's id : you'd have something like
>
> ["905"] // 905 points for post "1"
> ["1","36"] // 36 points for post "1/4"
> ["1","76"] // 76 po
Sorry for the repost. I was told user@ is more appropriate for this
kind of question:
I'm trying to implement a basic way of displaying comments in the way
that Hacker News provides, using CouchDB. Not only ordered
hierarchically, but also, each level of the tree should be ordered by
a "points" va
22 matches
Mail list logo
