Hi
Any inputs on these?
We are planning to upgrade to 1.6.1 to see if this issue is improved... Any
recommendation? Is it possible to run in a cluster different versions of
couchdb (1.2.2 and 1.6.1 for instance) with replication among them?
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 11:27 AM, Roger Sindreu wrote:
Hi
I have tried deleting the single validate_doc function we had but it seems
it still happens the same.
This is our replication filter in case it helps:
"replication": "function(doc, request) {
if (doc[\".type\"] == \"update_log\" && doc._deleted) {
return false;
}
if (doc._
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 1:23 AM, Alexander Shorin wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 12:00 PM, Roger Sindreu wrote:
>> Any way to know what document is stopping? Actually the replication is
>> missing something like 40 documents, but right now I don't know which
>> documents are among the 400K docu
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 12:00 PM, Roger Sindreu wrote:
> Any way to know what document is stopping? Actually the replication is
> missing something like 40 documents, but right now I don't know which
> documents are among the 400K documents our database has.
For now, you'd only grep the logs and
Hi, have you tried to turn off all your validate_doc_update ? I faced the
same probleme than you and it was just the validation function preventing
replicated documents to be written.
Le 25 févr. 2015 10:01, "Roger Sindreu" a écrit :
> Hi Riyad, all
>
> Thanks for the response. I am still having
Hi Riyad, all
Thanks for the response. I am still having this issue... your explanation
could be reasonable, because the replication breaks in one direction but
not in the other one. Is this something fixed in newer versions?
Any way to know what document is stopping? Actually the replication is
I am polling my spotty long-term memory, but this sounds similar to an
issue someone had from last year where one of his attachments had become
corrupt and it was doing the same thing, stopping replication at the exact
same spot. Once the attachment was removed from the doc, replication was
fine ag
How big they would have to be to be problematic? They are very small (like
30mb) maximum...
Could this be a bug?
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 10:46 PM, Giovanni P wrote:
> I don't know. Can it be attachments?
>
> On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 5:19 PM, Roger Sindreu wrote:
>
> > Any suggestions/ideas on tha
I don't know. Can it be attachments?
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 5:19 PM, Roger Sindreu wrote:
> Any suggestions/ideas on that?
>
> Any help will be appreciated.
>
> Thanks
>
> On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 11:57 AM, Roger Sindreu
> wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> Nice to be here and thanks everyone for the
Any suggestions/ideas on that?
Any help will be appreciated.
Thanks
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 11:57 AM, Roger Sindreu wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Nice to be here and thanks everyone for their support to couchdb.
>
> We have a installation with couchdb 1.2.2 (a few gigabytes and hundreds of
> thousa
Hi everyone,
Nice to be here and thanks everyone for their support to couchdb.
We have a installation with couchdb 1.2.2 (a few gigabytes and hundreds of
thousands of documents), with 3 machines being replicated.
Our issue is that the replication from one machine to the other two will
never get
11 matches
Mail list logo
