Ahh...phone typo... What he said kinda made me doubt my knowledge... But
I'm glad that what I thought is right
On Oct 1, 2013 9:43 AM, "Jens Alfke" wrote:
>
> On Oct 1, 2013, at 7:51 AM, Stanley Iriele wrote:
>
> > "Rtree is 100 to,es faster than couchdb"
On Oct 1, 2013, at 7:51 AM, Stanley Iriele wrote:
> "Rtree is 100 to,es faster than couchdb"
(Is “to,es” a mathematical term or just a typo for “times”? ;-)
I think this comparison is apples vs. oranges, as R-tree is a data structure
while CouchDB is a program. There is a geo
"Rtree is 100 to,es faster than couchdb"
this comment was made today in a meeting when I brought up couchdb's
incremental map/reduce feature especially for time series data.
I thought R-tree was a type of tree and couchdb used some betree or kd tree
for building indexes.
Am i