Re: Rtree is 100 to,es faster than couchdb

2013-10-01 Thread Stanley Iriele
Ahh...phone typo... What he said kinda made me doubt my knowledge... But I'm glad that what I thought is right On Oct 1, 2013 9:43 AM, "Jens Alfke" wrote: > > On Oct 1, 2013, at 7:51 AM, Stanley Iriele wrote: > > > "Rtree is 100 to,es faster than couchdb"

Re: Rtree is 100 to,es faster than couchdb

2013-10-01 Thread Jens Alfke
On Oct 1, 2013, at 7:51 AM, Stanley Iriele wrote: > "Rtree is 100 to,es faster than couchdb" (Is “to,es” a mathematical term or just a typo for “times”? ;-) I think this comparison is apples vs. oranges, as R-tree is a data structure while CouchDB is a program. There is a geo

Rtree is 100 to,es faster than couchdb

2013-10-01 Thread Stanley Iriele
"Rtree is 100 to,es faster than couchdb" this comment was made today in a meeting when I brought up couchdb's incremental map/reduce feature especially for time series data. I thought R-tree was a type of tree and couchdb used some betree or kd tree for building indexes. Am i