re
>> stimulated to answer by the reputation mechanism.
>> I don't think SO should be the only programming community, but I think
>> it's better for the CouchDB contributors to focus on CouchDB itself, using
>> external services when they are available. StackOver
> option, Discourse can be another, a little more expensive (you need to host
> it somewhere, to upgrade when a new version come out, and you also need
> some mods), OSQA is gonna probably require a major effort because it's not
> maintained anymore.
>
> > If we have someone to s
st cheap option,
Discourse can be another, a little more expensive (you need to host it
somewhere, to upgrade when a new version come out, and you also need some
mods), OSQA is gonna probably require a major effort because it's not
maintained anymore.
> If we have someone to set it up a
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Mark Deibert wrote:
> @Matt: "Devil's Advocate" or "The Devil's Advocate". The later features
> Charlize Theron and that's a very good thing!
>
>
Yes ^that one, with Charlize! (and Neo, and Pacino)
@Matt: "Devil's Advocate" or "The Devil's Advocate". The later features
Charlize Theron and that's a very good thing!
Yeah I know, I was mostly kidding about the "eliminate all other sites" bit
;-)
I'm just so very tired and bored with SO. Tired of having to sift through a
hundred+ SO garbage pos
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Mark Deibert wrote:
> @Filippo and a couple others: Are you arguing that it would be acceptable
> to forcibly close and eliminate all other programming communities because
> SO/SE is so absolutely perfect that we don't need any other online
> communities?
I am ce
a
> > separate site, at least on StackOverflow where a programmer can be
> > interested in both Android and CouchDB and he wants earn reputation
> > answering questions related to different arguments.
> >
> > -Filippo
> >
> > On Oct 31,
id and CouchDB and he wants earn reputation
> answering questions related to different arguments.
>
> -Filippo
>
> On Oct 31, 2013, at 7:15 PM, Florian Westreicher Bakk.techn. wrote:
>
> > I was talking about the osqa tool.
> >
> > One the topic of couchdb.stackexchang
15 PM, Florian Westreicher Bakk.techn. wrote:
> I was talking about the osqa tool.
>
> One the topic of couchdb.stackexchange.com sub domain: I develop android for
> a living and never use the Android SX page, I think they are kind of
> pointless. I rather stick to SO and answe
I was talking about the osqa tool.
One the topic of couchdb.stackexchange.com sub domain: I develop android for a
living and never use the Android SX page, I think they are kind of pointless. I
rather stick to SO and answer tags
"matt j. sorenson" wrote:
>On Thu, Oct 31, 20
@Matt: Your point about managers search for "CouchDB" and seeing the SO/SE
results at the top are certainly valid. However, this is something that can
be easily managed with good SEO on the (some) new CouchDB Community site.
No reason for your own site not to appear at/near the top of
Google/Bing/Y
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Mark Deibert wrote:
> "Discourse" is looking another "partner" site to run and test their
> software. Not sure if this is worth a look or not. It's not the Q&A format
> that's been discussed so far, but it sure looks very modern and
> interesting...
>
> http://www
els (e.g. SO) to make their 2-minute
determination on whether it is indeed viable technology...
and so on :)
>
> To be clear I am looking for a tool to handle QA that can be controlled by
> the community: the content license, the way you can extend it... It
> appeared to me that OSQA could
; discuss here.
>
> Also I don't buy the argument of "there are more people on SO". One true
> thing is that most are here too even if you had to register. Simply reusing
> your email could also work as your login, you don't need more.
>
> But I don't want
n such considerations yet. It's kind of
premature.
To be clear I am looking for a tool to handle QA that can be controlled by
the community: the content license, the way you can extend it... It
appeared to me that OSQA could have been a good way to do it. From the
discussion I can see a list of q
+1
On Oct 31, 2013, at 4:32 PM, matt j. sorenson wrote:
> An anecdote on re: manpower applied to a theoretical ASF-hosted alternative
>
> I've been a participant of and observer to the Drupal open source community
> for nearly a decade. Drupal version 7 was released, I believe, in March
> 2011.
An anecdote on re: manpower applied to a theoretical ASF-hosted alternative
I've been a participant of and observer to the Drupal open source community
for nearly a decade. Drupal version 7 was released, I believe, in March
2011. Drupal.org, the canonical destination for contributions to drupal
al
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 9:45 AM, Florian Westreicher Bakk.techn. <
st...@meredrica.org> wrote:
> The problem I see is account explosion. I have a SO account, why would I
> register another? Also, I would not even think about looking somewhere else
> first (apart from docs and Google)
>
>
This is [
The problem I see is account explosion. I have a SO account, why would I
register another? Also, I would not even think about looking somewhere else
first (apart from docs and Google)
Daniel Gonzalez wrote:
>If you are worried that no specific stack exchange site will be created
>for
>couchdb,
As you can see there are just few specialized sites, but the critical mass
maybe it's not important, in fact there is a site dedicated to Tridon and
another one to SharePoint. The Area 51 FAQ doesn't answer the question, but
maybe it is a good start.
http://area51.stackexchange.com/
http://area
If you are worried that no specific stack exchange site will be created for
couchdb, why not just officially address support/issues to the couchdb tag
in stack overflow? For example, Ember.js is doing just that:
http://emberjs.com/community
"StackOverflow is used to track questions. Just tag your
@Filippo: Can you qualify "not big enough"?
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 10:09 PM, matt j. sorenson >wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Benoit Chesneau > >wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 7:50 PM, matt j. sorenson <
> m..
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 10:09 PM, matt j. sorenson wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Benoit Chesneau >wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 7:50 PM, matt j. sorenson > >wrote:
> >
> > > >
> > > > >> On Oct 30, 2013, at 5:21 PM, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >> My goal is to have
You can try to ask, but I don't think Stack Exchange will create a network site
for CouchDB. I think the CouchDB user base is not big enough.
-Filippo
On Oct 30, 2013, at 10:09 PM, matt j. sorenson wrote:
> SO and the ever-expanding stackexchange topic-centric sites have tremendous
> traction, i
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 7:50 PM, matt j. sorenson >wrote:
>
> > >
> > > >> On Oct 30, 2013, at 5:21 PM, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
> > >
> > > >> My goal is to have a website managed by the Apache CouchDB project
> > where
> > > >> the neutral
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 7:50 PM, matt j. sorenson wrote:
> >
> > >> On Oct 30, 2013, at 5:21 PM, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
> >
> > >> My goal is to have a website managed by the Apache CouchDB project
> where
> > >> the neutrality, privacy and independence is guaranteed. Having a
> system
> > we
> >
>
> >> On Oct 30, 2013, at 5:21 PM, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
>
> >> My goal is to have a website managed by the Apache CouchDB project where
> >> the neutrality, privacy and independence is guaranteed. Having a system
> we
> >> can host where all the content is under the apache license would make
> s
ke quite a bit of work, which might be
better spent on CouchDb.
Nick
> On 30 Oct 2013, at 17:31, Filippo Fadda
> wrote:
>
> Someone told me to not argue with you and I don't. :-)
>
> Anyway I'm not saying OSQA doesn't fit the CouchDB community needs, I'm
up such QA system.
> --
> ,,,^..^,,,
>
indeed. there was also my unmaintained nymphormation:
https://github.com/benoitc/nymphormation
- benoit
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 12:09 PM, Benoit Chesneau
> wrote:
> > I discovered recently OSQA which is an opensource QA system which is more
&
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 6:45 PM, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
>
>
>
> Anyway I'm not saying OSQA doesn't fit the CouchDB community needs, I'm
>> just saying OSQA can't be compared with StackOverflow in term of
>> functionalities. StackOverflow is a complex s
ng in the open .
Anyway I'm not saying OSQA doesn't fit the CouchDB community needs, I'm
> just saying OSQA can't be compared with StackOverflow in term of
> functionalities. StackOverflow is a complex software system with versioning
> management, moderation ba
:
> I discovered recently OSQA which is an opensource QA system which is more
> in phase which what I described sometimes ago to handle the questions and
> such things from any user. I wonder if someone already tested it and if it
> would be a good fit for us:
>
> http://www.osqa.net/
>
> thoughts?
>
> - benoit
Someone told me to not argue with you and I don't. :-)
Anyway I'm not saying OSQA doesn't fit the CouchDB community needs, I'm just
saying OSQA can't be compared with StackOverflow in term of functionalities.
StackOverflow is a complex software system with versionin
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Filippo Fadda <
filippo.fa...@programmazione.it> wrote:
> OSQA has just a subset of StackOverflow features. You can't even compare
> them. I'm implementing something similar to StackOverflow (with some Reddit
> and WordPress features) a
OSQA has just a subset of StackOverflow features. You can't even compare them.
I'm implementing something similar to StackOverflow (with some Reddit and
WordPress features) and I really know what I'm talking about. Programmers tend
to minimize the complexity of a system, but Sta
On 10/30/2013 03:09 AM, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
> I discovered recently OSQA which is an opensource QA system which is more
> in phase which what I described sometimes ago to handle the questions and
> such things from any user. I wonder if someone already tested it and if it
> would b
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 12:09 PM, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
> I discovered recently OSQA which is an opensource QA system which is more
> in phase which what I described sometimes ago to handle the questions and
> such things from any user. I wonder if someone already tested it and if it
&
omeone should
> install OSQA and give a look to see what it can do. Maybe it's better,
> maybe not. There so much going on at SO. So much static there. A nice,
> focused on Couch only, site would be my preference :-)
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Aurélien Bénel &
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 9:02 AM, Mark Deibert wrote:
> I suppose it's very similar to SO and perhaps no better. Someone should
> install OSQA and give a look to see what it can do. Maybe it's better,
> maybe not. There so much going on at SO. So much static there. A nice,
>
I suppose it's very similar to SO and perhaps no better. Someone should
install OSQA and give a look to see what it can do. Maybe it's better,
maybe not. There so much going on at SO. So much static there. A nice,
focused on Couch only, site would be my preference :-)
On Wed, Oct 30,
Hi,
> OSQA looks like the exact tool we need for CouchDB discussion/Q&A!
Why would it succeed better than StackOverFlow?
Just because it is open-source?
Regards,
Aurélien
OSQA is pretty good. But not being retained any more. I think we might as
well you stack overflow.
On Oct 30, 2013 2:10 AM, "Benoit Chesneau" wrote:
>
> I discovered recently OSQA which is an opensource QA system which is more
> in phase which what I described sometime
OSQA looks like the exact tool we need for CouchDB discussion/Q&A!
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 4:24 AM, Garren Smith wrote:
> Hi Benoit,
>
> That looks really good. I think that could be quite helpful for Couchdb.
> It would definitely make it easier for someone to search and disco
:
I discovered recently OSQA which is an opensource QA system which is more
in phase which what I described sometimes ago to handle the questions and
such things from any user. I wonder if someone already tested it and if it
would be a good fit for us:
http://www.osqa.net/
thoughts?
- benoit
I discovered recently OSQA which is an opensource QA system which is more
in phase which what I described sometimes ago to handle the questions and
such things from any user. I wonder if someone already tested it and if it
would be a good fit for us:
http://www.osqa.net/
thoughts?
- benoit
45 matches
Mail list logo