Hi All,
Currently I have a keyBy user and I see uneven load distribution since some
of the users would have very high load versus some users having very few
messages. Is there a recommended way to achieve even distribution of
workload? Has someone else encountered this problem and what was the
wor
I forget to add the user mailing list in the response. I now add user
mailing list to the response in case other users might want to solve this
problem too...
Soheil Pourbafrani 于2019年7月15日周一 上午2:56写道:
> Great!
> I got it
>
> Thanks
>
> On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 8:26 PM Caizhi Weng wrote:
>
>> Hi
(Oops, I mistakenly sent my response only to Rong Rong. Sorry Rong...)
Hi Morrisa,
This is due to a bug in the old flink planner. The `createTable(new
PlannerQueryOperation(relational.rel))` method in flink-table-planner ->
`TableEnvImpl` -> `sqlQuery` should be `createTable(new
PlannerQueryOpera
Hi Aaron,
>From my understanding, you want shutting down a Task Manager without
restart the job which has tasks running on this Task Manager?
Based on current implementation, if there is a Task Manager is down, the
tasks on it would be treated as failed. The behavior of task failure is
defined vi
How many Job manager did you configure ?
On Mon, Jul 15, 2019, 07:11 Marzieh Ghasemy wrote:
> Hello I have a Mesos cluster of two master and three slaves, I configured
> Marathon and Zookeeper. My Zookeeper cluster has five nodes. When I run
> Flink Json file via Marathon, it is run, but I ca
HelloI have a Mesos cluster of two master and three slaves, I configured
Marathon and Zookeeper. My Zookeeper cluster has five nodes. When I run Flink
Json file via Marathon, it is run, but I can see Flink UI in just one slave.
Other slaves show me this error:Service temporarily unavailable due
Hi,
It seems that sometimes your job can not finish checkpoint during 1 minute
(timeout in your configuration).
The checkpoint of 9867 is expired. The 9868 costs 50 seconds, almost
reaches the timeout limit. However the 9869 and 9870 finished quite soon.
It's more like a performance issue. So it'
Also, are the event time timers and processing time timers handled separately
- ie, if I register event time timer and then use the same timestamp to delete
processing time timer - will it remove the event time timer registration ?
In the example
https://github.com/streaming-with-flink/examp
Hi:
If I register both event time timer and processing time timer with the same
timestamp for a particular key - will they both fire or only one will fire ? If
only one, what will be its time domain ?
Thanks
Dear community,
happy to share this weeks community update with Apache Flink 1.9, bylaws
for Apache Flink, Savepoints vs Checkpoints, Flink on ARM, and more.
As always, please feel free to add additional updates and news to this
thread!
Flink Development
===
* [releases] The release
Hi:
Is it safe to manipulate the state of an object in the evictor or trigger ?
Are there any best practices/dos and don't on this ?
Thanks
timestamp of the fourth data is (03:17:55), and the watermark time should be
03:17:50(water mark is 5).
That time, window of the first data(ts:03:15:48) should be closed.
What's more, there're so many sliding windows, and some of them should be
closed to.
--
Hi,
I added a ttl to my state
*old version :*
private lazy val stateDescriptor = new ValueStateDescriptor("foo",
Types.CASE_CLASS[DomainState])
*vs the new version *
@transient
private lazy val storeTtl = StateTtlConfig.newBuilder(90)
.setUpdateType(StateTtlConfig.UpdateType.OnCreateAndWrite)
13 matches
Mail list logo