Thank you! Hoping to see Lambda support added back in soon as well.
Regards,
David
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 1:57 PM, Kostas Kloudas wrote:
> Done.
>
> On Jun 12, 2017, at 12:24 PM, Ted Yu wrote:
>
> Can you add link to this thread in the JIRA
Hello,
It's been a while and I have never replied on the list. In fact, the fix
committed by Till does work. Thanks!
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 9:37 AM, Moiz Jinia wrote:
> Hey David,
> Did that work for you? If yes could you share an example. I have a similar
> use case -
t; wrote:
>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> I'll try to come up with an example illustrating the behaviour over the
>> weekend.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Till
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 11:16 AM, David Koch <ogd...@googlemail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
ain, how would the "not
>>>>> match" be triggered if no event at all occurs?
>>>>>
>>>>> Good question.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm not sure whether the following will work:
>>>>>
>>>>> This could be d
at uses both of
>>>> "notNext" (or "notFollowedBy") and "within" constructs. Something like
>>>> this:
>>>>
>>>> Pattern<Event, ?> pattern = Pattern.begin("first")
>>>> .notNext("second"
he case of processing time, we could think about registering timeout
> timers for processing time. However, I would highly recommend you to use
> event time, because with processing time, Flink cannot guarantee meaningful
> computations, because the events might arrive out of order.
>