Will you all be pushing Docker images for the 1.11.6 release?

On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 3:26 AM Chesnay Schepler <ches...@apache.org> wrote:

> The current ETA is 40h for an official announcement.
> We are validating the release today (concludes in 16h), publish it
> tonight, then wait for mirrors to be sync (about a day), then we announce
> it.
>
> On 15/12/2021 12:08, V N, Suchithra (Nokia - IN/Bangalore) wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
>
>
> Could you please tell when we can expect Flink 1.12.7 release? We are
> waiting for the CVE fix.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Suchithra
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Chesnay Schepler <ches...@apache.org> <ches...@apache.org>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 15, 2021 4:04 PM
> *To:* Richard Deurwaarder <rich...@xeli.eu> <rich...@xeli.eu>
> *Cc:* user <user@flink.apache.org> <user@flink.apache.org>
> *Subject:* Re: CVE-2021-44228 - Log4j2 vulnerability
>
>
>
> We will also update the docker images.
>
>
>
> On 15/12/2021 11:29, Richard Deurwaarder wrote:
>
> Thanks for picking this up quickly!
>
>
>
> I saw you've made a second minor upgrade to upgrade to log4j2 2.16 which
> is perfect.
>
>
>
> Just to clarify: Will you also push new docker images for these releases
> as well? In particular flink 1.11.6 (Sorry we must upgrade soon! :()
>
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 2:33 AM narasimha <swamy.haj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks TImo, that was helpful.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 7:19 PM Prasanna kumar <
> prasannakumarram...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Chesnay Thank you for the clarification.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 6:55 PM Chesnay Schepler <ches...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> The flink-shaded-zookeeper jars do not contain log4j.
>
>
>
> On 13/12/2021 14:11, Prasanna kumar wrote:
>
> Does Zookeeper have this vulnerability dependency ? I see references to
> log4j in Shaded Zookeeper jar included as part of the flink distribution.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 1:40 PM Timo Walther <twal...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> While we are working to upgrade the affected dependencies of all
> components, we recommend users follow the advisory of the Apache Log4j
> Community. Also Ververica platform can be patched with a similar approach:
>
> To configure the JVMs used by Ververica Platform, you can pass custom
> Java options via the JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS environment variable. Add the
> following to your platform values.yaml, or append to the existing value
> of JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS if you are using it already there, then redeploy
> the platform with Helm:
> env:
>    - name: JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS
>      value: -Dlog4j2.formatMsgNoLookups=true
>
>
> For any questions, please contact us via our support portal.
>
> Regards,
> Timo
>
> On 11.12.21 06:45, narasimha wrote:
> > Folks, what about the veverica platform. Is there any
> mitigation around it?
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 3:32 PM Chesnay Schepler <ches...@apache.org
> > <mailto:ches...@apache.org>> wrote:
> >
> >     I would recommend to modify your log4j configurations to set
> >     log4j2.formatMsgNoLookups to true/./
> >     /
> >     /
> >     As far as I can tell this is equivalent to upgrading log4j, which
> >     just disabled this lookup by default.
> >     /
> >     /
> >     On 10/12/2021 10:21, Richard Deurwaarder wrote:
> >>     Hello,
> >>
> >>     There has been a log4j2 vulnerability made public
> >>     https://www.randori.com/blog/cve-2021-44228/
> >>     <https://www.randori.com/blog/cve-2021-44228/> which is making
> >>     some waves :)
> >>     This post even explicitly mentions Apache Flink:
> >>
> https://securityonline.info/apache-log4j2-remote-code-execution-vulnerability-alert/
> >>     <
> https://securityonline.info/apache-log4j2-remote-code-execution-vulnerability-alert/
> >
> >>
> >>     And fortunately, I saw this was already on your radar:
> >>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-25240
> >>     <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-25240>
> >>
> >>     What would the advice be for flink users? Do you expect to push a
> >>     minor to fix this? Or is it advisable to upgrade to the latest
> >>     log4j2 version manually for now?
> >>
> >>     Thanks for any advice!
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > A.Narasimha Swamy
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> A.Narasimha Swamy
>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to