Re: [DISCUSS][FLINK-31788][FLINK-33015] Add back Support emitUpdateWithRetract for TableAggregateFunction

2023-09-10 Thread Feng Jin
Thanks Jane for following up on this issue! +1 for adding it back first. Supporting emitUpdateWithRetract for TableAggregateFunction is a good feature, we should support it unless there are better alternatives. Best, Feng On Thu, Sep 7, 2023 at 11:01 PM Lincoln Lee wrote: > Thanks to Jane fo

Re: [DISCUSS][FLINK-31788][FLINK-33015] Add back Support emitUpdateWithRetract for TableAggregateFunction

2023-09-07 Thread Lincoln Lee
Thanks to Jane for following up on this issue! +1 for adding it back first. For the deprecation, considering that users aren't usually motivated to upgrade to a major version (1.14, from two years ago, wasn't that old, which may be part of the reason for not receiving more feedback), I'd recommen

Re: [DISCUSS][FLINK-31788][FLINK-33015] Add back Support emitUpdateWithRetract for TableAggregateFunction

2023-09-07 Thread Jark Wu
+1 to fix it first. I also agree to deprecate it if there are few people using it, but this should be another discussion thread within dev+user ML. In the future, we are planning to introduce user-defined-operator based on the TVF functionality which I think can fully subsume the UDTAG, cc @Timo