Chen
From: Samrat Deb
Sent: Wednesday, November 1, 2023 15:31
To: d...@flink.apache.org
Cc: user@flink.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS][FLINK-33240] Document deprecated options as well
Thanks for the proposal ,
+1 for adding deprecated identifier
[Thought] Can we have sep
options.
Best,
Zhanghao Chen
From: Alexander Fedulov
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2023 18:12
To: d...@flink.apache.org
Cc: user@flink.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS][FLINK-33240] Document deprecated options as well
Hi Zhanghao,
Thanks for the proposition.
In general
Thanks for the proposal.
+1 from my side and +1 for putting them to a separate section.
Best,
Hang
Samrat Deb 于2023年11月1日周三 15:32写道：
> Thanks for the proposal ,
> +1 for adding deprecated identifier
>
> [Thought] Can we have seperate section / page for deprecated configs ? Wdut
> ?
>
>
> Bests
Hi Zhanghao,
Thanks for the proposition.
In general +1, this sounds like a good idea as long it is clear that the
usage of these settings is discouraged.
Just one minor concern - the configuration page is already very long, do
you have a rough estimate of how many more options would be added with
Thanks for your proposal, Zhanghao Chen. I think it adds more transparency
to the configuration documentation.
+1 from my side on the proposal
On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 2:09 PM Zhanghao Chen
wrote:
> Hi Flink users and developers,
>
> Currently, Flink won't generate doc for the deprecated options
Hi Flink users and developers,
Currently, Flink won't generate doc for the deprecated options. This might
confuse users when upgrading from an older version of Flink: they have to
either carefully read the release notes or check the source code for upgrade
guidance on deprecated options.
I pro
