Re: [External] naming table stages

2021-07-28 Thread JING ZHANG
Hi Yuval, Thanks for pointing that out. Yes, metrics names would also be affected. The need sounds reasonable, we could create a JIRA and give a detailed description of the requirements. cc @godfrey @Kurt to provide more user perspective, they may be interested in the feature. Best, JING ZHANG

Re: [External] naming table stages

2021-07-28 Thread Yuval Itzchakov
Hi Jing, An additional challenge with the current Table API / SQL approach for iperator naming is that it makes it very hard to export metrics, i.e. to track watermarks with Prometheus, when operator names are not assignable by the user. On Wed, Jul 28, 2021, 13:11 JING ZHANG wrote: > Hi

Re: [External] naming table stages

2021-07-28 Thread JING ZHANG
Hi Clemens, This feature is temporarily not supported. Your needs sounds reasonable, you could create a JIRA ticket. Now operator name contains a lot of detailed information, it has advantages and disadvantages. When we need troubleshoot problems, detailed information could help us to know what

[External] naming table stages

2021-07-27 Thread Clemens Valiente
Is it possible to rename execution stages from the Table API? Right now the entire select transformation appears in plaintext in the task name so the log entries from ExecutionGraph are over 10,000 characters long and the log files are incredibly difficult to read. for example a simple selected