Yes, that is correct.
Kostas
> On May 26, 2017, at 11:05 AM, Moiz S Jinia wrote:
>
> Thanks Kostas. So even though the timer state is managed separately from the
> key state (from runtimeContext) I can safely assume both the states to be
> fault tolerant and maintain association with the key
Thanks Kostas. So even though the timer state is managed separately from
the key state (from runtimeContext) I can safely assume both the states to
be fault tolerant and maintain association with the key of the stream?
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 1:51 PM, Kostas Kloudas wrote:
> Hi Moiz,
>
> state.c
Hi Moiz,
state.clear() refers to the state that you have registered in your job, using
the getState()
from the runtimeContext.
Timers are managed by Flink’s timer service and they are cleaned up by Flink
itself when
the job terminates.
Kostas
> On May 26, 2017, at 6:41 AM, Moiz S Jinia wro
A follow on question. Since the registered timers are part of the managed
key state, do the timers get cancelled when i call state.clear()?
Moiz
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 10:20 PM, Moiz S Jinia wrote:
> Awesome. Thanks.
>
> On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 10:13 PM, Eron Wright
> wrote:
>
>> Yes, registe
Awesome. Thanks.
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 10:13 PM, Eron Wright wrote:
> Yes, registered timers are stored in managed keyed state and should be
> fault-tolerant.
>
> -Eron
>
> On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 9:28 AM, Moiz S Jinia
> wrote:
>
>> With a checkpointed RocksDB based state backend, can I expec
Hi Moiz!
Adding a bit of more detail here:
Yes, the timer will be restored on whatever new instance is responsible for
that key.
There is one “gotcha” to look out for, though: the firing time of timers are
absolute; what this means is that if the checkpoints timer’s firing processing
timestamp
Yes, registered timers are stored in managed keyed state and should be
fault-tolerant.
-Eron
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 9:28 AM, Moiz S Jinia wrote:
> With a checkpointed RocksDB based state backend, can I expect the
> registered processing timers to be fault tolerant? (along with the managed
> ke
With a checkpointed RocksDB based state backend, can I expect the
registered processing timers to be fault tolerant? (along with the managed
keyed state).
Example -
A task manager instance owns the key k1 (from a keyed stream) that has
registered a processing timer with a timestamp thats a day ahe