ut all three fields instead of t(product), I don’t face the issue..
Thanks,
-- Piyush
From: JingsongLee
Reply-To: JingsongLee
Date: Tuesday, June 4, 2019 at 2:42 AM
To: JingsongLee , Piyush Narang ,
"user@flink.apache.org"
Subject: Re: Clean way of expressing UNNE
, JingsongLee
--
From:JingsongLee
Send Time:2019年6月4日(星期二) 13:35
To:Piyush Narang ; user@flink.apache.org
Subject:Re: Clean way of expressing UNNEST operations
Hi @Piyush Narang
It seems that Calcite's type inference is not perfect
Hi @Piyush Narang
It seems that Calcite's type inference is not perfect, and the fields of return
type can not be inferred in UNNEST. (Errors were reported during the Calcite
Validate phase.)
But UDTF supports this usage, and if it's convenient, you might consider
writing a UDTF with similar
Hi folks,
I’m using the SQL API and trying to figure out the best way to unnest and
operate on some data.
My data is structured as follows:
Table:
Advertiser_event:
* Partnered: Int
* Products: Array< Row< price: Double, quantity: Int, … > >
* …
I’m trying to unnest the products
