wrote:
Hi,please use `CheckpointedFunction`, you could initialize your operator state
in `initializeState` method by using context.getOperatorStateStore().***
Best regards,
JING ZHANG
Marco Villalobos 于2021年6月5日周六 下午1:55写道：
Is it possible to use OperatorState, when NOT implementing a sour
;
>> Hi,
>> please use `CheckpointedFunction`, you could initialize your operator
>> state in `initializeState` method by using
>> context.getOperatorStateStore().***
>>
>> Best regards,
>> JING ZHANG
>>
>>
>> Marco Villalobos 于2021年6月5日周六 下午1:5
:2021/06/05 19:56:08
Recipient:JING ZHANG
Cc:user
Theme:Re: Is it possible to use OperatorState, when NOT implementing a source
or sink function?
Does that work in the DataStream API in Batch Execution Mode?
On Sat, Jun 5, 2021 at 12:04 AM JING ZHANG wrote:
Hi,please use `CheckpointedFunction
> Best regards,
> JING ZHANG
>
>
> Marco Villalobos 于2021年6月5日周六 下午1:55写道：
>
>> Is it possible to use OperatorState, when NOT implementing a source or
>> sink function?
>>
>> If yes, then how?
>>
>
Hi,
please use `CheckpointedFunction`, you could initialize your operator state
in `initializeState` method by using context.getOperatorStateStore().***
Best regards,
JING ZHANG
Marco Villalobos 于2021年6月5日周六 下午1:55写道：
> Is it possible to use OperatorState, when NOT implementing a source
Is it possible to use OperatorState, when NOT implementing a source or sink
function?
If yes, then how?
