Re: Issue with Flink SQL using RocksDB backend

2021-07-28 Thread Timo Walther
Hi Yuval, having a locally reproducible result would be great. Also more information about the used data types. Because this could be a serializer issue that messes up the binary format. Regards, Timo On 27.07.21 07:37, Yuval Itzchakov wrote: Hi Jing, Yes, FIRST is a UDAF. I've been tryi

Re: Issue with Flink SQL using RocksDB backend

2021-07-26 Thread Yuval Itzchakov
Hi Jing, Yes, FIRST is a UDAF. I've been trying to reproduce this locally without success so far. The query itself has more fields and aggregates. Once I can reproduce this locally I'll try to narrow down the problematic field and share more information. On Tue, Jul 27, 2021, 05:17 JING ZHANG

Re: Issue with Flink SQL using RocksDB backend

2021-07-26 Thread JING ZHANG
Hi Yuval, I run a similar SQL (without `FIRST` aggregate function), there is nothing wrong. `FIRST` is a custom aggregate function? Would you please check if there is a drawback in `FIRST`? Whether the query could run without `FIRST`? Best, JING ZHANG Yuval Itzchakov 于2021年7月27日周二 上午12:29写道: >

Issue with Flink SQL using RocksDB backend

2021-07-26 Thread Yuval Itzchakov
Hi, *Setup:* 1 JM, 1 TM, Flink 1.13.1 RocksDBStateBackend. I have a query with the rough sketch of the following: SELECT CAST(TUMBLE_START(event_time, INTERVAL '2' MINUTE) AS TIMESTAMP) START_TIME CAST(TUMBLE_END(event_time, INTERVAL '2' MINUTE) AS TIMESTAMP) END_TIME