Re: Kubernetes operator's merging strategy for template arrays

2023-02-23 Thread Alexis Sarda-Espinosa
Ah I see, I'll have a look, thanks. Am Do., 23. Feb. 2023 um 14:21 Uhr schrieb Gyula Fóra : > If you are interested in helping to review this, here is the relevant > ticket and the PR I just opened: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-30786 > https://github.com/apache/flink-kubernetes

Re: Kubernetes operator's merging strategy for template arrays

2023-02-23 Thread Gyula Fóra
If you are interested in helping to review this, here is the relevant ticket and the PR I just opened: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-30786 https://github.com/apache/flink-kubernetes-operator/pull/535 Cheers, Gyula On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 2:10 PM Gyula Fóra wrote: > Hi! > > The cu

Re: Kubernetes operator's merging strategy for template arrays

2023-02-23 Thread Gyula Fóra
Hi! The current array merging strategy in the operator is basically an overwrite by position yes. I actually have a pending improvement to make this configurable and allow merging arrays by "name" attribute. This is generally more practical for such cases. Cheers, Gyula On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 1

Kubernetes operator's merging strategy for template arrays

2023-02-23 Thread Alexis Sarda-Espinosa
Hello, I noticed that if I set environment variables in both spec.podTemplate & spec.jobManager.podTemplate for the same container (flink-maincontainer), the values from the latter selectively overwrite the values from the former. For example, if I define something like this (omitting metadata pro