Hi Alijoscha,
It is very helpful to me to understand the behavior on such scenario. Thank
you very much!!!
Best Regards,
Tony Wei
2017-08-28 20:00 GMT+08:00 Aljoscha Krettek :
> Hi Tony,
>
> I think your analyses are correct. Especially, yes, if you re-read the
> data the (ts=3) data should sti
Hi Tony,
I think your analyses are correct. Especially, yes, if you re-read the data the
(ts=3) data should still be considered late if both consumers read with the
same speed. If, however, (ts=3) is read before the other consumer reads (ts=8)
then it should not be considered late, as you said.
Hi,
Recently, I studied about watermark from Flink documents and blogs.
I have some question about this scenario below.
Suppose there are five clients sending events with different time to the
topic on Kafka.
Topic has two partitions and five events' timestamp are (ts=1), (ts=2),
(ts=3), (ts=8),
