This is unfortunately the realm of the ASF over which we don't have direct
control. We could think about filing an INFRA JIRA ticket to report this
problem (if it can be backtracked).
On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 2:42 PM Gianluca Ortelli <
gianl...@mediadistillery.com> wrote:
> Hi Till,
>
> I also
Hi Till,
I also believe that it's a problem with a single mirror. It was not a
blocking problem for me; I just wanted you to be aware of it, in case you
have some policy regarding the management of mirrors.
Best,
Gianluca
On Mon, 1 Oct 2018 at 14:27, Till Rohrmann wrote:
> Hi Gianluca,
>
>
Hi Gianluca,
I've downloaded flink-1.6.1-bin-scala_2.11.tgz from here [1] and verified
that the shasum512 and the signature are both correct.
The only way I could explain this is that either your downloaded artifacts
or the mirror you got the binaries from got corrupted.
[1]
Hi Fabian,
the mirror is
https://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/flink/flink-1.6.1/flink-1.6.1-bin-scala_2.11.tgz
I just tried a download and the hash is still wrong: it should be
Hi Gianluca,
I tried to validate the issue but hash and signature are OK for me.
Do you remember which mirror you used to download the binaries?
Best, Fabian
Am Sa., 29. Sep. 2018 um 17:24 Uhr schrieb vino yang :
> Hi Gianluca,
>
> This is very strange, Till may be able to give an
Hi Gianluca,
This is very strange, Till may be able to give an explanation, because it
is the release manager of this version.
Thanks, vino.
Gianluca Ortelli 于2018年9月28日周五 下午4:02写道：
> Hi,
>
> I just downloaded flink-1.6.1-bin-scala_2.11.tgz from
> https://flink.apache.org/downloads.html and
Hi,
I just downloaded flink-1.6.1-bin-scala_2.11.tgz from
https://flink.apache.org/downloads.html and noticed that it fails signature
verification with a
gpg: BAD signature from "Till Rohrmann (stsffap) "
message. The sha512 hash doesn't match either.
I switched to 1.6.0, which verifies OK.
