Re: proposal for new site

2005-06-07 Thread Bruce Snyder
On 6/7/05, David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I didn't mean to be the deciding vote, I'd still like to know what others > think. We haven't heard from very many people on this thread. > > Hey everyone out there who has ever had an opinion on the website, what do > you think? > > Again

Re: RSS Syndication and Aggregation

2005-06-07 Thread Dain Sundstrom
On Jun 7, 2005, at 10:54 AM, Scott Anderson wrote: This health reporting system you describe seems to be a worthwhile project and should shed some light on how this syndication service could be structured and integrated with. I am thinking of leveraging Geronimo's support for JMX to gener

Re: proposal for new site

2005-06-07 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
On Jun 7, 2005, at 2:37 PM, David Blevins wrote: I didn't mean to be the deciding vote, You weren't I'd still like to know what others think. We haven't heard from very many people on this thread. Hey everyone out there who has ever had an opinion on the website, what do you think?

Re: proposal for new site

2005-06-07 Thread David Blevins
I didn't mean to be the deciding vote, I'd still like to know what others think. We haven't heard from very many people on this thread. Hey everyone out there who has ever had an opinion on the website, what do you think? Again, I'm talking to everyone, not just people privileged with commit a

Re: proposal for new site

2005-06-07 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
Ok - I pushed it out. When the servers synch, it will be there. We need a more complete list of dependencies - and the intention isn't our dep list, but rather the "collaboration" list. We have a dep on clogging, for example, but I wouldn't consider that a collaboration. Also, I'll summ

Re: RSS Syndication and Aggregation

2005-06-07 Thread Scott Anderson
This health reporting system you describe seems to be a worthwhile project and should shed some light on how this syndication service could be structured and integrated with. I am thinking of leveraging Geronimo's support for JMX to generate the content for these feeds. Let me know if you know of a

Re: proposal for new site

2005-06-07 Thread David Blevins
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 05:59:26AM -0400, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: > > On Jun 7, 2005, at 3:49 AM, David Blevins wrote: > > >On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 09:19:08PM -0400, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: > > > >>The upside is that it takes <10 seconds to fully generate, so > >>adding content is a breeze. >

Re: proposal for new site

2005-06-07 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
On Jun 7, 2005, at 3:49 AM, David Blevins wrote: On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 09:19:08PM -0400, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: The upside is that it takes <10 seconds to fully generate, so adding content is a breeze. That right there is enough for me. A definite step in the right direction. Let

Re: proposal for new site

2005-06-07 Thread David Blevins
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 09:19:08PM -0400, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: > The upside is that it takes <10 seconds to fully generate, so > adding content is a breeze. That right there is enough for me. A definite step in the right direction. -David

Re: RSS Syndication and Aggregation

2005-06-07 Thread Dain Sundstrom
I have been thinking about this for a little bit now, and I'm really excited. What I'm thinking is we use RSS to syndicate server health information. For example, we could have a simple feed with an article for each application loaded into the server, and the content of the article is hea