Re: Web Service Problem

On 10/11/06, Clough, Ray C PWR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I wrote a simple demo WS which deployed fine under Geronimo 1.0. I recently tried upgrading it to G1.1.1 and I've failed miserably. I used the upgrade tool to modify the geronimo-web.xml and geronimo-application.xml files.

tranql local connecter (unable to rollback as auto-commit is true)

Hi, I have a datasource (for DB2) that is created using the tranql-local-connecter (generic one, because the org.tranql.connector.db2.LocalMCF class for db2 is not bundled in the db2 binary). Anyway the problem I encounter is not related to this. It seems that tranql seems to be setting

Re: Multiple Applications within one Ear - Co-dependent classes

Thanks for the response. I am not sure i gave enough information the first time as to what our problem truly is. We are using a factory to instanciate a list of classes. This factory lives at the EAR level; the list of classes are spread thru-out the multiple web modules. This means that the

Webapps exposed on distinct ports

Greetings all, I am trying to figure out how to solve this exact same problem as described by Rick (below) where I need to deploy different apps to different tomcat connectors on different ports (already available). David says this capability became available in 1.1. Does anyone know

Weekly: Geronimo 1.2-r463140

Geronimo 1.2-r463140 - Oct 4, 2006 http://people.apache.org/dist/geronimo/unstable/1.2-r463140/ geronimo-1.2-r463140-src.tar.gz geronimo-1.2-r463140-src.zip geronimo-framework-1.2-r463140.tar.gz geronimo-framework-1.2-r463140.zip geronimo-jetty-j2ee-1.2-r463140.tar.gz

Using Geronimo JavaMail implementation

Hi, I would like to upgrade the Email Webservice shipped with Intalio|BPMS (http://bpms.intalio.com/content/view/114/84/) to use the Geronimo Javamail implementation. It will greatly ease the installation procedure as you won't require to download the Sun implementation. The web-service is

Using Geronimo JavaMail implementation

Hi, I would like to upgrade the Email Webservice shipped with Intalio|BPMS (http://bpms.intalio.com/content/view/114/84/) to use the Geronimo Javamail implementation. It will greatly ease the installation procedure as you won't require to download the Sun implementation. The web-service is

Re: Using Geronimo JavaMail implementation

Arnaud Blandin wrote: Hi, I would like to upgrade the Email Webservice shipped with Intalio|BPMS (http://bpms.intalio.com/content/view/114/84/) to use the Geronimo Javamail implementation. It will greatly ease the installation procedure as you won't require to download the Sun implementation.

RE: Web Service Problem

I would be happy both to send you the app and to contribute to info about deploying on Geronimo. Of course, I have been unsuccessful deploying to Geronimo, as yet. It deployed on G1.0, but G1.1.1 gives me a meaningless stack trace about 1000 lines long. In order to keep my deployment free of

[ANNOUNCE] Geronimo 1.1.1 Certified on Azul Compute Appliances

The Apache Geronimo Project is pleased to announce the J2EE 1.4 Certification of Apache Geronimo 1.1.1 running on an Azul Compute Appliance. The testing was performed on an Azul Compute Appliance Model 1920B (8 chip / 192 cores, 64GB memory) coupled with Azul VM release 2.3.1.2 (HotSpot™ Java™

Re: Webapps exposed on distinct ports

On Oct 12, 2006, at 9:33 AM, Mark Bradley wrote: Greetings all, I am trying to figure out how to solve this exact same problem as described by Rick (below) where I need to deploy different apps to different tomcat connectors on different ports (already available). David says this

Re: Webapps exposed on distinct ports

Hi David, Yes, I can give a specific example. I have two tomcat connectors available in Geronimo (1.1.1): 1) TomcatWebConnector (port 8080) 2) Tomcat2 (port 8081) My application.xml currently looks like this: application xmlns=http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee;