Re: Clustering Geronimo with Open Terracotta

Comments inline.. Gianny Damour wrote: On 17/02/2007, at 3:32 AM, Dave Colasurdo wrote: Tomcat and Mod-jk provide the ability to have the load balancer lock a particular httpsession (identified by session cookie) to a specific cluster member. This cluster member will serve all the

Re: Clustering Geronimo with Open Terracotta

Comments inline.. Orion Letizi wrote: This is very cool. You beat me to it-- I was going to add a clustering with geronimo to our wiki as well. The more documentation the better. Feel free to use any of the content from the Geronimo Wiki in your article. A few areas that could be explore

Clustering Geronimo with Open Terracotta

I've added an article to the Geronimo wiki that describes how to cluster Geronimo HTTP Session web application data using the Open Terracotta project. http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDEV/clustering-geronimo-with-open-terracotta.html Feel free to get it a try.. Also, the clustering articles in th

Java EE 5.0 Report Card updated

The Java EE 5.0 Report card has been updated on the project wiki. This update incorporates all the recent 2.0-M1 activity and other recent developments relating to Java EE 5.0. Please take a second to review it for accuracy. http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Geronimo+Java+E

Re: Http Session Clustering

Dennis Cartier wrote: Hi Guys, Could anyone give me an idea of what the current time frame is for having HTTP session clustering included in Geronimo (Tomcat) by default? Simple Tomcat clustering of HTTP sessions has been supported since Geronimo 1.0... See: http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDO

Re: Geronimo and Cookies-code snippet

Depending on the urls you are specifying for the test, you may need to specify cookie.setPath("/") when creating the cookie. -Dave- sreepriya ramakrishnan wrote: Geronimo V 1.0 . Is there something else I need to do? --- Paul McMahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: When I pasted that code into

Re: Web Service Sample Application

That would be awesome.. Thanks!! I'm unaware of anyone else working on this. -Dave- Lasantha Ranaweera wrote: Hi All, I saw there is an empty sample application under web services section in Geronimo user guide. Does anybody working on that? I would like to contribute on that. Thanks, La

Re: JEE 5.0 Report Card

I've reorganized the JEE 5.0 report card a bit and updated it with the latest info relating to the spec levels and available packages. See: http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-jee-50-report-card.html Please take a few minutes to review and comment/update as appropriate. Thanks -Dave- D

Re: Geronimo clustering

orward ALL web requests to our mod_jk loadbalancer workers JkMount /* loadbalancer Thanks for ur help. Regards Krish n 7/13/06, Dave Colasurdo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ahh, just remembered one other issue I encountered, extra whitespace after the IP addresses in config.xml seeme

Re: Geronimo clustering

Ahh, just remembered one other issue I encountered, extra whitespace after the IP addresses in config.xml seemed to mess things up. You should also make sure that is ok in your copy.. -Dave- Dave Colasurdo wrote: Also, if you are using your own application .. Do you have the webapp marked as

Re: Geronimo clustering

Also, if you are using your own application .. Do you have the webapp marked as distributable in web.xml? -Dave- Dave Colasurdo wrote: Krish, I downloaded fresh copies of G1.1 and tried clustering again. I did not see the behavior you are describing. Failover of session data worked as

Re: Geronimo clustering

uster members are active. Regards Krish I have configured jvmRoute On 7/11/06, Dave Colasurdo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Krish, A few things to check.. 1) jvmRoute is unique for each node 2) The value used in jvmRoute agrees with the value set in the mod-jk configuration (e

Re: Geronimo clustering

Krish, A few things to check.. 1) jvmRoute is unique for each node 2) The value used in jvmRoute agrees with the value set in the mod-jk configuration (e.g. jvmRoute=node1, jvmRoute=node2, and worker.loadbalancer.balance_workers=node1,node2, worker.node1.port=8009, etc.) 3) Deployment plan

Re: minor issues with 1.1 rc1 server console

I'm seeing the same exception when using the "out of box" configuration that is present in the release candidate. Simply navigating to "server logs" in the console creates the problem. -Dave- Aaron Mulder wrote: Looks like the portlet might break if there's no web access log configured. Is

Geronimo 1.1 web tier clustering (with Tomcat 5.5.15) - documentation

The Geronimo 1.1 web tier clustering documentation (using Tomcat 5.5.15) and updated deployment plans are available at: http://opensource.atlassian.com/confluence/oss/display/GERONIMO/Geronimo+Clustering+Example -Dave-

Re: Clustering help..!

in sticky session replication will not happen., it is altogether a new episode! , thanks for clearing it..! Thanks, Santosh. "Don't talk about yourself; it will be done when you leave. " -Original Message- From: Dave Colasurdo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thurs

Re: Clustering help..!

ter member.. The idea is that the end user (web browser) will continue to work (with the same contents in their "shopping cart") without ever knowing that a server failed. Thanks, Santosh. "Don't talk about yourself; it will be done when you leave. " -----Origina

Re: Clustering help..!

Comments below.. Santosh Koti wrote: Hernan, I got it working finally , both with the sticky session=0,1 , in non-sticky session , some time it fails...! Any idea..? I'd recommend always running with sticky session enabled. This means that all requests from a particular client (e.

Re: Deployment pblm in G1.1

he deployment actually worked and I can access the app at: http://localhost:8080/HelloWorld/ -dain On Apr 13, 2006, at 7:09 AM, Dave Colasurdo wrote: I'm seeing a different result with a simple HelloWorld.war test. It deploys fine on G1.0 but doesn't on G1.1.. I've tried

Re: Deployment pblm in G1.1

I sure hope not. But if you do provide a plan, it wouldn't shock me if the config ID was required -- it was certainly required in 1.0 if you did use a Geronimo plan. I think we should get David or Dain to chime in. Thanks, Aaron On 4/12/06, Dave Colasurdo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Re: Deployment pblm in G1.1

Does anyone know the answers to the attached questions? I've heard that others are having similar deployment problems with G1.1 cmdline deployment.. Should I open JIRAs? Thanks -Dave- Dave Colasurdo wrote: BTW, My questions refer to simple web application WARs.. Thanks -Dave-

Re: Deployment pblm in G1.1

BTW, My questions refer to simple web application WARs.. Thanks -Dave- Dave Colasurdo wrote: Can someone please provide details on G1.1 deployment... :) 1) G1.0 user applications did not always require a deployment plan. Shouldn't these same applications deploy on G1.1 without a plan?

Re: Deployment pblm in G1.1

n be ommitted in which case a timestamp is used. - sachin On Apr 10, 2006, at 4:24 PM, Sachin Patel wrote: I think your configID is wrong - sachin On Apr 10, 2006, at 4:19 PM, Dave Colasurdo wrote: Yep.. Here it is... http://geronimo.apache.org/xml/ns/web"; x

Re: Deployment pblm in G1.1

apache.org/xml/ns/naming";> /hello Thanks -Dave- Aaron Mulder wrote: Does the WAR have a geronimo-web.xml? If so, can you post the contents? Thanks, Aaron On 4/10/06, Dave Colasurdo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I've successfully rebuilt G1.1 via an online build.. Thoug

Re: Deployment pblm in G1.1

in, I haven't seen your problem, but I suspect a full build (maven clean new) would help. Thanks, Aaron On 4/10/06, Dave Colasurdo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Just did a fresh checkout and tried again.. Have attached the failure.. Can try again without -o but suspec

Re: Deployment pblm in G1.1

errors are you having today? Thanks, Aaron On 4/10/06, Aaron Mulder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: There have been a lot of fixes (to both logging and deployment) in the last week. You should try again with a fresh 1.1 build. Thanks, Aaron On 4/10/06, Dave Colasurdo <[EMAIL PROTECTE

Deployment pblm in G1.1

I'm tying to deploy a simple war using G1.1 and deployment is failing. I've seen the same failure with several different applications both with and without deployment plans.. The same applications work fine on G1.0. Here is the error: AUM:/home/davecola/geronimo-1.1-040506/assemblies/j2ee-jet

Re: User Feedback Request -- Usability Focus

Thanks David B. for starting this valuable thread. I'd like to hijack a sub-thread to get the user community's thoughts on how the usability of Geronimo can be improved. What are the areas that you believe need improvement? Some of the areas that have already been mentioned include: deployme

Re: User Feedback Request -- this means you!

I've updated the wiki with all the feedback (including the latest from Toby and Rohit).. http://opensource.atlassian.com/confluence/oss/display/GERONIMO/Geronimo+User+Requirements Dave Colasurdo wrote: I tried to order them by priority (based on number of times mentioned) within each cat

Re: User Feedback Request -- this means you!

On Apr 5, 2006, at 4:07 PM, Dave Colasurdo wrote: I tried to order them by priority (based on number of times mentioned) within each category/sub-category.. The ones that were mentioned the most are first on the list and so forth.. Items that were mentioned only once are listed in random or

Re: User Feedback Request -- this means you!

ll post to the wiki.. -Dave- Matt Hogstrom wrote: This is great Dave...I think we need to prioritze them as well. Can you translate the priorty from the other e-mails to this? Matt Dave Colasurdo wrote: Excellent feedback from all.. Here is an attempt to consolidate the feedback into one l

Re: User Feedback Request -- this means you!

Excellent feedback from all.. Here is an attempt to consolidate the feedback into one list. (Hope I'm not stepping on anyone's toes.) I've grouped by a few high level categories.. Of course, one could argue that some of the items could fall into multiple categories... Any glaring omissions?

Re: Dynamic Query

Gianny Damour wrote: Sorry for this late reply - I was focused on completing the implementation of dynamic queries, which is now available in trunk. Gianny, Has this been committed? I didn't see any code changes associated with GERONIMO-1668 or Dynamic Query. Thanks -Dave-

Re: how can I change the network listener for a web module?

Young, FYI, There is a related item on the *future* Roadmap page (i.e. Multiple Server Instance Support) that would address your requirement without requiring a re-installation. Search for "Multiple server" on the following page: http://opensource2.atlassian.com/confluence/oss/display/GERON

Re: how to keep the server process alive on Fedora Linux

I'm wondering if the JVM is crashing. Anyone know if/where the sun JDK produces a core dump file? Does a JVM property need to be specified to produce a core dump? -Dave- Kevan Miller wrote: Qingtian, Thanks for keeping after this... What was the date/time of the last log entry in var/log/

Re: Geronimo JVM Configuration Portlet

Anyone who is managing their network from outside of the firewall really needs to be conscious of security exposures and should only allow access to the console with the ssl transport (https) and user authentication (hopefully with something other than system/manager). We should add this to ou

Re: Geronimo instances on the same server

John, Isn't there a manual workaround needed in G 1.0 for the JMXConnector (RMI port) as mentioned in GERONIMO-1352? -Dave- John Sisson wrote: Cristian Roldan wrote: Hi All, Does Geronimo support installing several instances on the same server ? each instance running independently .

Tomcat Clustering documentation for Geronimo v1 updated

The Geronimo Tomcat clustering documentation has been updated for v1. The jvmRoute can now be easily set in config.xml instead of specifying it at server startup. http://opensource2.atlassian.com/confluence/oss/display/GERONIMO/Geronimo+Clustering+Example Be aware that this is geronimo Tomcat

Re: Geronimo Clustering support

James, Hot off the press, here is a link to an example application that describes how to use tomcat clustering within geronimo. This is the precursor to WADI.. http://opensource2.atlassian.com/confluence/oss/display/GERONIMO/Geronimo+Clustering+Example -Dave- James Ho Chan wrote: I unde

Re: Release 1.0 Status - Release Candidate 20051219 Available for Review

Have downloaded and tested teh latest candidate and can offer the following feedback: - startup verbosity on windows is fixed.. - The latest Release note updates seem to be missing from the build. Hmm the code change email notifications had indicated that Aaron committed the changes.. ?? -

Re: Deployment Plans in doc/plan

s are running into problems. Seeing some real basic problems getting to the CatalinaClusterGBean constructor. Any chance of getting a fresh plan.xml for Tomcat clustering that contains a working/near-working configuration? Thanks -Dave- Dave Colasurdo wrote: At M5 time the deployment plans fo

Deployment Plans in doc/plan

At M5 time the deployment plans for the predeployed configurations were published in the binary distributions in doc/plan/*-plan.xml. For v1, what is the process for updating the configuration within a binary distribution? Are all of the updates now made via config.xml? Is there still a need

Re: Geronimo WAR deploy matrix

! > -Original Message- > From: Dave Colasurdo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: jeudi 20 octobre 2005 16:53 > To: dev@geronimo.apache.org > Subject: Wiki Page for Samples > > I've taken an initial stab at creating the wiki pages for the Geronimo > Samples. The

Re: Geronimo disk footprint growth at startup

Hiram Chirino wrote: By default we use 2 x 20 meg journal files. The logs need to hold a good working set of the in flight persistent messages that are flowing through the system. It's optimum if message that was written to the log file is held long enough so that ack for that message ca

Re: Geronimo disk footprint growth at startup

Bruce Snyder wrote: The size of the recovery log can be scaled down through it's configuration in the doc/plan/j2ee-server-plan.xml. The following steps outline the process of changing the Geronimo configuration: 1) Stop the server 2) Edit the j2ee-server-plan.xml to experiment with the HOWL

Re: Geronimo disk footprint growth at startup

Dain Sundstrom wrote: On Aug 17, 2005, at 10:11 AM, Dave Colasurdo wrote: Thanks Bruce.. A few followup questions.. Is there any bound on how large these files can grow or a way to configure a smaller value for the recovery log? I don't believe the files grow at all. IIRC the l

Re: Geronimo disk footprint growth at startup

wondering if there is a way to limit the default disk footprint requirement for geronimo.. Bruce Snyder wrote: On 8/17/05, Dave Colasurdo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I've recently noticed that the geronimo disk footprint (on a Windows platform) seems to grow from 55M to 96M when the

Geronimo disk footprint growth at startup

I've recently noticed that the geronimo disk footprint (on a Windows platform) seems to grow from 55M to 96M when the application server is started. It seems that the culprit is \geronimo\var\activemq\journal\log-00*.dat.. What exactly are these log files? Is there a simple way to disable th