AWS EMR is a pretty good reason to keep 0.20 around. But as soon as they provide more options, I'd like to re-visit this. Thanks!
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 6:33 AM, Clive Cox <clive....@rummble.com> wrote: > > I've just started playing with Giraph and also have the issue with > Eclipse and munging, though I've not looked deeply into if there is a > solution. > > I'm using 1.0.3 Hadoop locally but would also like to ensure Giraph says > compatible with AWS ElasticMapReduce which only uses 0.20.x Hadoop at > present. > > > On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 15:13 +0200, Paolo Castagna wrote: >> Sebastian Schelter wrote: >> > AFAIK 0.20.x is the current stable version most people run on, so I >> > think it would not be a good idea... >> >> Are those 'most people' using Giraph too? Or, not? >> If they are, they should/could reply to this email and say so. :-) >> >> Paolo >> >> > >> > sebastian >> > >> > >> > >> > On 06.06.2012 14:58, Paolo Castagna wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> (perhaps, a stupid question but...) would it be a problem dropping Giraph >> >> support for Hadoop v0.20.x? >> >> >> >> If this is possible, it might be possible to simplify the all munging >> >> situation >> >> and even get rid of it, which would simplify the life for some of >> >> developers >> >> and/or users who might want to create and submit a patch using an IDE >> >> (such as >> >> Eclipse, for example). >> >> >> >> Cheers, >> >> Paolo >> > >> > >
