I'm happy to announce that the Apache Giraph PMC has elected Eli Reisman to
the PMC in recognition of his sustained and substantial contributions over
the past year. Most recently, he's been toiling away at getting Giraph
onto YARN, which is a huge win.
Congrats, Eli. Your robe and secret decode
On behalf of the PMC, I'm very happy to announce that Eli's been voted a
committer on Apache Giraph. Eli's shown amazing enthusiasm and skill these
past few months and we're all looking forward to making Giraph even better
with his help.
Congrats, Eli!
> Hopefully new reviewboard requests will work well again.
>
>
> On 7/16/12 12:02 PM, Jakob Homan wrote:
>
>> Anyone know what needs to be done to get the automated messages
>> reviewboard is sending out whitelisted on the dev list? We're getting
>> moderation requests for every one...
>>
>
>
>
I don't believe so. The from list seems reasonable on each one:
-- Forwarded message --
From: "Avery Ching"
To: "Avery Ching"
Cc: "giraph" , "Alessandro Presta"
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
>
>
ing on EMR?
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 9:13 AM, Jakob Homan wrote:
> AWS EMR is a pretty good reason to keep 0.20 around. But as soon as
> they provide more options, I'd like to re-visit this. Thanks!
>
> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 6:33 AM, Clive Cox wrote:
>>
>> I
I'm seeing the same problem on our secure clusters with the latest
builds from trunk. I've opened GIRAPH-212 and am investigating...
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 6:52 AM, Gianmarco De Francisci Morales
wrote:
> Thanks Eugene,
>
> just to answer your question on the configuration, I am unable to share
Hey all,
I added a Powered By page to the wiki:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GIRAPH/Powered+By so that
we can start to crow a bit about Giraph's imminent and current
successes. If you're already using Giraph in your organization
(commericial, non-profit or academic), it would be g
AWS EMR is a pretty good reason to keep 0.20 around. But as soon as
they provide more options, I'd like to re-visit this. Thanks!
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 6:33 AM, Clive Cox wrote:
>
> I've just started playing with Giraph and also have the issue with
> Eclipse and munging, though I've not looked
It's certainly worth getting a survey of this. With the new RPC we're
munging mainly for the differences between 0.20 and 1+. If we drop
0.20 we can probably stop munging pretty quickly.
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 6:13 AM, Paolo Castagna
wrote:
> Sebastian Schelter wrote:
>> AFAIK 0.20.x is the cur
Three or four small patches is equivalent to three or four branches,
one for each version of Hadoop. That seems like a pretty big hassle
over the long term.
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Paolo Castagna
wrote:
> Jakob Homan wrote:
>>> While I see no problem in replacing the Had
> While I see no problem in replacing the Hadoop RPC with the Netty
> implementation
> Avery contributed, I am not 100% sure about the implications in relation to
> secure vs. non-secure versions of Hadoop.
Those running netty in a secure cluster need to know we're totally
secure. Agreed that we
11 matches
Mail list logo
