caps lock key and capital letters

Hi, Pressing the Caps Lock key during an RDP session doesn't seem to have any effect at all. The user keeps typing lowercase. I'm aware of this: https://jira.glyptodon.com/browse/GUAC-850 A quick test at http://guacamole.apache.org/pub/tests/guac/keyboard-test with Firefox shows this:

Re: Update to 1.1.0 breaks RDP

On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 6:43 PM haroldtheb wrote: > I have the same problem. I have Guacamole running in a LXD Ubuntu 18.04 > container. V1.0 works fine. > Upgraded freerdp-dev and then upgraded everything per the install > instructions (build the server and used the pre-built war file. I

Re: Required help for reducing High Bandwidth Utilization of Guacamole

No, unless the RDP server is horribly broken, Guacamole will receive only incremental updates for the changed portions of the screen, and will only forward incremental updates to the client. On Mon, Feb 17, 2020, 18:46 Manoj Patil wrote: > Mike, > > I am really see on chrome when I am open a

Re: Update to 1.1.0 breaks RDP

I have the same problem. I have Guacamole running in a LXD Ubuntu 18.04 container. V1.0 works fine. Upgraded freerdp-dev and then upgraded everything per the install instructions (build the server and used the pre-built war file. I was able to connect to xRDP sessions on other linux machines

Re: Update to 1.1.0 breaks RDP

If you are connecting to Windows 10 (version 1903 or higher), you have to disable WDDM support on the windows 10 machine/VM. ⁣Have a great day, Andrew​ On 18 Feb. 2020, 09:14, at 09:14, jacotec wrote: >Hi, > >I'm not at my computer yet, but I've tried the Remmina PPA with a 2020 >version of

Re: Error 114 in gaucd?

As I understand it the fundamental issue is primarily down to OEM graphics drivers for older machines being incompatible with the >1903 version of Win 10. Although I've not had the problem myself it initially seemed to me from what I read that it's all to do with the server end and there'd be

Re: Update to 1.1.0 breaks RDP

Hi, I'm not at my computer yet, but I've tried the Remmina PPA with a 2020 version of freerdp2 with no success. I'm running guacd on Ubuntu Server 18.04 it that helps. I'll fra to find out how to set the loglevel to debug tomorrow. -- Sent from:

Re: Ubuntu 19 and MySQL Connector/J

On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 2:25 PM MysticRyuujin wrote: > It seems that Ubuntu repo maintainers have dropped support for > `libmysql-java` in favor of `libmariadb-java` which results in a very > annoying situation where we have to manually download and install the > connector and can no longer rely

AW: Update to 1.1.0 breaks RDP

Hi Mike, I don´t want to open a bug report with FreeRDP unless using a recent version. And right now it is not clear to me whether it is a bug in FreeRdP, whether recent or not, or a bug in Guacamole 1.1. The fact that it works when connecting with FreeRDP itself, is more of an indicator (not

Ubuntu 19 and MySQL Connector/J

It seems that Ubuntu repo maintainers have dropped support for `libmysql-java` in favor of `libmariadb-java` which results in a very annoying situation where we have to manually download and install the connector and can no longer rely on apt to keep the connector updated because Guacamole seems

Re: Update to 1.1.0 breaks RDP

On Mon, Feb 17, 2020, 10:58 Joachim Lindenberg wrote: > Hello Mike, all, > > I tried to use a nightly build of freerdp because of > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GUACAMOLE-952, but failed. I´d > definitely appreciate if the team could provide instructions how to build a > guacd docker

AW: Update to 1.1.0 breaks RDP

Hello Mike, all, I tried to use a nightly build of freerdp because of https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GUACAMOLE-952, but failed. I´d definitely appreciate if the team could provide instructions how to build a guacd docker image

Re: Required help for reducing High Bandwidth Utilization of Guacamole

On Mon, Feb 17, 2020, 10:35 Manoj Patil wrote: > Hi mike > > Help me in that matter how I am decrypt the tcp packet. And find out what > data is travel? > > I am using domain name with https connection. > You can't. You need to capture the data at a point where it is not encrypted. - Mike

Re: Update to 1.1.0 breaks RDP

On Mon, Feb 17, 2020, 05:15 jacotec wrote: > Hi, > > after spending hours trying to resolve this I need to shout for help here. > ;-) > > I have a working setup of Guacamole 1.0.0 on Ubuntu 18.04, all is nice > here. > I've upgraded the installation and client to 1.1.0 (I did install >

Re: Required help for reducing High Bandwidth Utilization of Guacamole

Hi mike Help me in that matter how I am decrypt the tcp packet. And find out what data is travel? I am using domain name with https connection. On Mon, 17 Feb 2020, 23:44 Mike Jumper, wrote: > On Mon, Feb 17, 2020, 10:09 Manoj Patil wrote: > >> Hi , >> >> I am see in browser Guacamole send

Re: Required help for reducing High Bandwidth Utilization of Guacamole

On Mon, Feb 17, 2020, 10:09 Manoj Patil wrote: > Hi , > > I am see in browser Guacamole send full-screen images from the server to > the client. > Can this is utilized bandwidth? > No, Guacamole does not do this. Guacamole sends incremental rectangles of image data, *not* full screen images.

Re: Required help for reducing High Bandwidth Utilization of Guacamole

Hi , I am see in browser Guacamole send full-screen images from the server to the client. Can this is utilized bandwidth? On Mon, 17 Feb 2020, 06:08 Mike Jumper, wrote: > On Sun, Feb 16, 2020, 16:31 Manoj Patil wrote: > >> Thanks Mike , >> >> I am continuously check http request and capture

Re: Error 114 in gaucd?

I can confirm WDDM resolves my issues on 1.0 or 1.1 on 18.04. Thanks guys. Brett -- Brett Ferrell bferr...@fastmail.fm On Sun, Feb 16, 2020, at 11:59 PM, ivanmarcus wrote: > Brett (and Andrew), > It does seem there's some RD issues with Win10 1903 vs 1809, although they're > meant to be

Update to 1.1.0 breaks RDP

Hi, after spending hours trying to resolve this I need to shout for help here. ;-) I have a working setup of Guacamole 1.0.0 on Ubuntu 18.04, all is nice here. I've upgraded the installation and client to 1.1.0 (I did install freerdp2-dev before as it's required now) but that fully breaks any

Re: LDAP in docker, no new users

I just noticed, if i add the users manually only by username, it also authenticates using LDAP. So could the user import, part be broken ? On 17/02/2020 13.11, Teis Angel Clausen wrote: Hey When i add new users to the AD group i specified in my docker-compose file, they do not appear in the

Problem with LDAP authentication

Hi, I have sucessfully installed Guacamole on a Centos 7 server. I can log in as user "guacadmin", create connections using RDP or SSH, and connect to different hosts. So far it works fine. However, I now would like to use LDAPS for use authentication. We do have an Active Directory which can be

LDAP in docker, no new users

Hey When i add new users to the AD group i specified in my docker-compose file, they do not appear in the Guacamole user list. Existing users, can still authenticate, and get access. This worked fine in version 1.0.0, where i added the LDAP_USER_SEARCH_FILTER parameter to the start.sh file,

Re: confirm subscribe to user@guacamole.apache.org

On Mon, 17 Feb 2020 12:04:06 + wrote: > Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing the > user@guacamole.apache.org mailing list. > > To confirm that you would like > >tobias.plu...@iap.unibe.ch > > added to the user mailing list, please send > a short reply to this address: > >

Re: Error 114 in gaucd?

On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 12:00 AM ivanmarcus wrote: > Brett (and Andrew), > > It does seem there's some RD issues with Win10 1903 vs 1809, although > they're meant to be addressed by now. > > If you've still got the 18.04 VM running with Guacamole 1.1.0 you could > try disabling "use WDDM

Re: Error 114 in gaucd?

I can confirm that disabling wddm fixes the issue and I can now connect via guacamole 1.1.0 to a windows 10.1909 session. ⁣Have a great day, Andrew​ On 17 Feb. 2020, 16:00, at 16:00, ivanmarcus wrote: >Brett (and Andrew), > >It does seem there's some RD issues with Win10 1903 vs 1809, although