Hi,
I've downloaded SecureBase.jar from github and have used it for my hbase
tables.I have no problem in hbase shell and can put and scan the table
correctly.
But when I wanna use MapReduce to scan a table and put some values to
another table,have got problems. My map phase is correct, but in
Dear Vjeran,
2013/4/14 Vjeran Marcinko vjeran.marci...@email.t-com.hr
Hi again,
** **
You actually touched what I'm trying to do here – setup best Hadooop
development environment.
[...]
**So are there any more hints for me to setup this environment?
In Eclipse you can use
That was a hidden shameless plug Ted ;-)
The main disadvantage of fs -cp is that all data has to transit via the
machine you issue the command on, depending on the size of data you want to
copy that can be a killer. DistCp is distributed as its name imply, so no
bottleneck of this kind then.
On
Hi all,
I was wondering whether anyone has ever used information retrieval metrics on
real-time big data
with variable amounts of data.
The main idea would be to test whether you can find relevant information for a
given time frame for two data repositories:
one baseline repository and one
I tend to use a real cluster so that I can test at a reasonable fraction of
scale.
I've seen some instances where code that ran 'okay' in aVM failed to perform
adequately at scale.
Sent from a remote device. Please excuse any typos...
Mike Segel
On Apr 14, 2013, at 2:19 AM, Jens Scheidtmann
Inline
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 1:13 AM, Mathias Herberts
mathias.herbe...@gmail.com wrote:
That was a hidden shameless plug Ted ;-)
Well, I will admit it was a shameless correction to Lance's absolute and
incorrect claim.
The main disadvantage of fs -cp is that all data has to transit
This is absolutely true. Distcp dominates cp for large copies. On the
other hand cp dominates distcp for convenience.
In my own experience, I love cp when copying relatively small amounts of
data (10's of GB) where the available bandwidth of about a GB/s allows the
copy to complete in less
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Mathias Herberts
mathias.herbe...@gmail.com wrote:
This is absolutely true. Distcp dominates cp for large copies. On the
other hand cp dominates distcp for convenience.
In my own experience, I love cp when copying relatively small amounts of
data
Hi Harsh,
If they are two separate cluster, instead of federated, haing the same
cluster ID, but using different name service ID, so can they use the same
journal nodes and ZK nodes?
and if they are also separated cluster, with different clusterID, but using
the same name service ID, so can they
