Hi Azuryy, just want to confirm one thing, your JN did not deploy on the same
machines within DN, right ?
Regards,
Liang
发件人: Azuryy Yu [azury...@gmail.com]
发送时间: 2013年2月18日 15:22
收件人: user@hadoop.apache.org
主题: Re: some ideas for QJM and NFS
Hi,
I did it on had
All JNs are deployed on the same node with DN.
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 3:35 PM, 谢良 wrote:
> Hi Azuryy, just want to confirm one thing, your JN did not deploy on the
> same machines within DN, right ?
>
> Regards,
> Liang
> --
> *发件人:* Azuryy Yu [azury...@gmail.com
IMHO, it's not a recommented deploy manner to deploy JN and DN into same nodes.
Regards,
Liang
发件人: Azuryy Yu [azury...@gmail.com]
发送时间: 2013年2月18日 15:56
收件人: user@hadoop.apache.org
主题: Re: 答复: some ideas for QJM and NFS
All JNs are deployed on the same node
> Regards,
> Liang
> --
> *发件人:* Azuryy Yu [azury...@gmail.com]
> *发送时间:* 2013年2月18日 15:56
> *收件人:* user@hadoop.apache.org
> *主题:* Re: 答复: some ideas for QJM and NFS
>
> All JNs are deployed on the same node with DN.
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 18, 20
Regards,
Liang
发件人: Azuryy Yu [azury...@gmail.com]
发送时间: 2013年2月18日 16:19
收件人: user@hadoop.apache.org
主题: Re: 答复: 答复: some ideas for QJM and NFS
I don't think this is an issue. QJM talks with JN using RPC, the default
handlers are enough for both DN and JN in my
--
> *发件人:* Azuryy Yu [azury...@gmail.com]
> *发送时间:* 2013年2月18日 16:19
> *收件人:* user@hadoop.apache.org
> *主题:* Re: 答复: 答复: some ideas for QJM and NFS
>
> I don't think this is an issue. QJM talks with JN using RPC, the
> default handlers are enough for both
