Any pointer to my question.
There is another question , kind-of dumb , but just wanted to clarify.
Say in a FIFO scheduler or a capacity scheduler , if there are slots
available and the first job doesn't need all of the available slots , then
the job next in the queue is scheduled for execution
Hi,
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 8:31 PM, Rahul Bhattacharjee
rahul.rec@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I was going through the job schedulers of Hadoop and could not see any major
operational difference between the capacity scheduler and the fair share
scheduler apart from the fact that fair share
Hi,
As the name suggest, Fair-scheduler does a fair allocation of slot to the
jobs.
Let say, you have 10 map slots in your cluster and it is occupied by a
job-1 which requires 30 map slot to finish. But the same time, another
job-2 require only 2 map slots to finish - Here slots will be provided
Thanks a lot for the replies , it was really helpful.
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 1:02 AM, Alok Kumar alok...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
As the name suggest, Fair-scheduler does a fair allocation of slot to the
jobs.
Let say, you have 10 map slots in your cluster and it is occupied by a
job-1 which
Hi,
I was going through the job schedulers of Hadoop and could not see any
major operational difference between the capacity scheduler and the fair
share scheduler apart from the fact that fair share scheduler supports
preemption and capacity scheduler doesn't.
Another thing is the former
