Thanks Wangda for the clarification .
I was thinking about
max(1, maxApplications * userlimit/100)
but
max(1, maxApplications * max(userlimit/100, 1/#activeUsers))
will be much more dynamic accurate as per the description of userlimit. Will
raise a issue and start working on it .
+Naga
I think it's not valid. Multiply it by ULF seems not reasonable, I think it
should be:
max(1, maxApplications * max(userlimit/100, 1/#activeUsers))
Assuming admin setups a very large ULF (e.g. 100), maxApplicationsPerUser
can be much more than maxApplications of a queue.
Also, multiply ULF to
