Re: Reliability of timestamps in logs

2015-01-27 Thread Ravi Prakash
I'm afraid I don't know what the SLS is. Obviously it shouldn't matter if it runs on the same node. I don't think hadoop code ever updates the system clock. In fact it shouldn't even be run with the perms to do so.It depends on log4j appenders whether they buffer and batch the messages before

Re: Reliability of timestamps in logs

2015-01-27 Thread Fabio
Thanks for the diagrams tip! I will try it. (SLS is the Scheduler Load Simulator http://hadoop.apache.org/docs/r2.6.0/hadoop-sls/SchedulerLoadSimulator.html ) Regards Fabio On 01/27/2015 11:04 PM, Ravi Prakash wrote: I'm afraid I don't know what the SLS is. Obviously it shouldn't matter if

Re: Reliability of timestamps in logs

2015-01-26 Thread Ravi Prakash
Are you running NTP? On Friday, January 23, 2015 12:42 AM, Fabio anyte...@gmail.com wrote: Hi guys, while analyzing SLS logs I noticed some unexpected behaviors, such as resources requests sent before the AM container gets to a RUNNING state. For this reason I started wondering how

Re: Reliability of timestamps in logs

2015-01-26 Thread Fabio
Yes I am, does it make a difference? SLS runs on a single machine, wrapping the RM and simulating the nodes, thus it should use just the system time. Or do you mean there is a chance it's updating the clock while the job is running? Regards Fabio On 01/26/2015 08:00 PM, Ravi Prakash wrote:

Reliability of timestamps in logs

2015-01-23 Thread Fabio
Hi guys, while analyzing SLS logs I noticed some unexpected behaviors, such as resources requests sent before the AM container gets to a RUNNING state. For this reason I started wondering how reliable is the timestamp of the log entries. Does log4j run on an independent thread? If yes, could it