Uhm... not exactly.
Power consumption is only part of it. ;-)
Power consumption by itself is not enough to establish probable cause.
If that were the case, there would be a lot of raids around the Xmas holidays
... ;-)
Now don't ask me how I know this ;-P
Having run a rack out of my
/463386_10151293008003232_1882563907_o.jpg
--
*From:* Michael Segel michael_se...@hotmail.com
*To:* user@hadoop.apache.org
*Sent:* Saturday, December 22, 2012 8:01 AM
*Subject:* Re: What should I do with a 48-node cluster
Uhm... not exactly.
Power consumption is only
You do not absolutely need more ram. You do not know your workload yet. A
standard hadoop machine has 8 disks 16 GB RAM, 8 cores.
In the old days, you would dedicate map slots and reduce slots map 3 map 1
reduce in your case. Give each of them 256 RAM for child jvm ops. So you
needed more ram in
You will also be raided by the DEA- too much power for a residence.
On 12/20/2012 07:56 AM, Ted Dunning wrote:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 7:38 AM, Michael Segel
michael_se...@hotmail.com mailto:michael_se...@hotmail.com wrote:
While Ted ignores that the world is going to end before
True!
I am thinking of either my (small) office, or actually hosting for under
$500/month.
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 1:37 PM, Lance Norskog goks...@gmail.com wrote:
You will also be raided by the DEA- too much power for a residence.
On 12/20/2012 07:56 AM, Ted Dunning wrote:
On Thu, Dec
Three year old blade center is ok. A three year old blade is probably a 64
bit machine. 2 to 4 gb RAM 2 SCSI disks. Maybe two socket two core. Two
blade centers is about 8u or a quarter cabinet and you can find a hosting
provider in your price range.
Especially if you can get the hardware at a
While Ted ignores that the world is going to end before X-Mas, he does hit the
crux of the matter head on.
If you don't have a place to put it, the cost of setting it up would kill you,
not to mention that you can get newer hardware which is better suited for less.
Having said that... if you
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 7:38 AM, Michael Segel michael_se...@hotmail.comwrote:
While Ted ignores that the world is going to end before X-Mas, he does hit
the crux of the matter head on.
If you don't have a place to put it, the cost of setting it up would kill
you, not to mention that you can
I had two servers at home, that's like a small airplane.
However, I have seen silent servers in a lab I am working in.
My price on that rack might be close to $0.
Then I could host a rack for $500/month. And if a machine breaks, I will
throw it away. So that makes for $ maintenance cost.
You
Hello sir,
If you think the deal fits in your budget, better go for it. It's just
a 1 time investment and provides you more control on your cluster than AWS.
You can get your hands dirty with some config admin stuff as well, in
case you haven't touched that part yet. But, go for it iff you
What about investing this cluster in a startup if u hv some awesomeideas :)
Who knows how much you might gain over next few years :)
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 19, 2012, at 7:29 PM, Mark Kerzner mark.kerz...@shmsoft.com wrote:
Sure, I love hardware, but aren't the hosting costs prohibitively
I am toying with exactly that idea. My startup does Hadoop eDiscovery, only
we usually do it on EC2. Getting down to earth is exciting but worrying.
Mark
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 9:32 PM, Mapred Learn mapred.le...@gmail.comwrote:
What about investing this cluster in a startup if u hv some
Who cares! 48 nodes = 1 node per hour the world has left. Take delivery
now and write a personal check. : )
Original Message
Subject: Re: What should I do with a 48-node cluster
From: Mark Kerzner mark.kerz...@shmsoft.com
Date: Wed, December 19, 2012 10:35 pm
To: user
: What should I do with a 48-node cluster
From: Mark Kerzner mark.kerz...@shmsoft.com
Date: Wed, December 19, 2012 10:35 pm
To: user@hadoop.apache.org
I am toying with exactly that idea. My startup does Hadoop eDiscovery,
only we usually do it on EC2. Getting down to earth is exciting
14 matches
Mail list logo
