That is correct, the client blocks and retries a configurable amount of time
until the regions are available again.
Lars
On Aug 2, 2012, at 7:01 AM, Mohit Anchlia wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Mohammad Tariq wrote:
>
>> Hello Mohit,
>>
>> If replication factor is set to som
I even move /hbase to hbase2, and create a new dir /hbase1, modify
hbase-site.xml to:
hbase.rootdir
hdfs://Hadoop48:54310/hbase1
zookeeper.znode.parent
/hbase1
But the error message still KeeperErrorCode = NoNode for /hbase
Any body can give any help?
Thanks!
Andy zhou
201
Hi,
The issue is in ZooKeeper, not directly HBase. It seems its data is
corrupted, so it cannot start. You can configure zookeeper to another
data directory to make it start.
N.
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 11:11 AM, abloz...@gmail.com wrote:
> I even move /hbase to hbase2, and create a new dir /hba
Hi
Which version you are using?
>From 0.94 in the balancer there are 2 ways of balancing. One is by table
>balancing in which balancer will make sure the regions for one table is
>balanced across the RSs. But in the other way of balancing in generic way it
>will consider all the regions acros
Seems this is available from 0.92 version.. See HBASE-3373
-Anoop-
From: Anoop Sam John [anoo...@huawei.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2012 3:24 PM
To: user@hbase.apache.org
Subject: RE: Region balancing question
Hi
Which version you are using?
>From
hbase.master.loadbalance.bytable - By default it is true.
Regards
Ram
> -Original Message-
> From: Anoop Sam John [mailto:anoo...@huawei.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2012 3:32 PM
> To: user@hbase.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Region balancing question
>
> Seems this is available from 0.
OK,
at first I will try the scans.
If that's too slow I will have to upgrade hbase (currently 0.90.4-cdh3u2) to be
able to use coprocessors.
Currently I'm stuck at the scans because it requires two steps (therefore some
kind of filter chaining)
The key: userId-dateInMllis-sessionId
At first
Thank you, Keywal and Mohammad.
I also think the data is corrupted, but the zookeeper is inner of Hbase, I
don't know how to change the zookeeper data directory. I'll try this way.
So if kill java process rudely, there may be corrupted of data. But
sometimes, stop shell script will not work.
Here
Excuse my double posting.
Here is the complete mail:
OK,
at first I will try the scans.
If that's too slow I will have to upgrade hbase (currently 0.90.4-cdh3u2) to be
able to use coprocessors.
Currently I'm stuck at the scans because it requires two steps (therefore maybe
some kind of fi
Hi Lars:
That is useful. I appreciate it. The idea about cross row transaction is an
interesting one.
Can I have an iterator on the client side that get rows from a coprocessor?
(i.e. Filtered rows are streamed into the client application and client can
access them via iterator)
Best Regards,
J
I'm running Nutch 2 which uses HBase for storage. It is attempting to
store files bigger than 10MB into HBase. This causes the KeyValue size too
large exception.
However, I've set the hbase.client.keyvalue.maxsize to 0, -1, and 100MB.
None of those have had an effect. AFAIK, it's finding my hba
0.92 doesn't have this feature. The change was rolled back.
FYI
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 3:01 AM, Anoop Sam John wrote:
> Seems this is available from 0.92 version.. See HBASE-3373
>
> -Anoop-
>
> From: Anoop Sam John [anoo...@huawei.com]
> Sent: Thursda
Hi Jerry,
you could create a RegionObserver implementation and have that implement the
postScannerOpen
hook and wrap the passed scanner with your own RegionScanner to do the
filtering.
Now, RegionObservers are still per region, so actually that would not help you
either.
Your best bet might b
+1.
So far I think timestamp is very useful. I would imagine if we can
configure the return, say in pre/post put, it would be even nicer.
Thanks,
Wei
Wei Tan
Research Staff Member
IBM T. J. Watson Research Center
19 Skyline Dr, Hawthorne, NY 10532
w...@us.ibm.com; 914-784-6752
From: "Ramk
I presplit the table. The regionservers have gone down on occassion but have
been up for a while (weeks). How could that result in having no regions on one
node?
On Aug 1, 2012, at 11:39 PM, Adrien Mogenet wrote:
> Did you pre split your table or did you let balancer assign regions to
> regio
I'm using 0.92 (Cloudera CDH4). Yes I definitely do not want to balance all
regions across all tables together, as some tables are much more active than
others and thus some regions are barely being used. I was thinking this might
be what the balancer was doing. The regions are balanced in terms
Bryan,
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3373 did not make it into
CDH4, there is not a real easy way to do this on your own. I have attached
some sample code to get your started with writing your own(a colleague of
mine wrote it).
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Bryan Keller wrot
Even when balancing by table the current default balancer does not
take into account region size, request rate, or memory usage. If you
want those things there's a new balancer in trunk (slated for 0.96)
that gives these things. However that patch is a little bit more
involved and applying it to
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 11:31 PM, Bryan Keller wrote:
> I have an 8 node cluster and a table that is pretty well balanced with on
> average 36 regions/node. When I run a mapreduce job on the cluster against
> this table, the data locality of the mappers is poor, e.g 100 rack local
> mappers and
It sounds like you are overlooking something, are you sure the client
is really picking the hbase-site.xml you think it is?
Also I don't get your reference to the hbase.rootdir, the client
doesn't use it and hbase.client.keyvalue.maxsize is client-side only.
J-D
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 7:26 AM, B
That was what I was missing. I moved it and that fixed it.
Thanks.
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 2:42 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans wrote:
> It sounds like you are overlooking something, are you sure the client
> is really picking the hbase-site.xml you think it is?
>
> Also I don't get your reference to the
I see what you mean about block locality, that is at the regionserver level,
transparent to the MR job. This doesn't happen only to the final mappers, some
of the early mappers are rack local. The table is reasonably well distributed
across the nodes but not perfectly (that is a question I have
Hi Christian!
If to put off secondary indexes and assume you are going with "heavy
scans", you can try two following things to make it much faster. If this is
appropriate to your situation, of course.
1.
> Is there a more elegant way to collect rows within time range X?
> (Unfortunately, the dat
Also Christian, don't forget you can read all the rows back to the client
and do the filtering there using whatever logic you like. HBase Filters
can be thought of as an optimization (predicate push-down) over client-side
filtering. Pulling all the rows over the network will be slower, but I
don'
I think this is exactly what Christian is trying to (and should be trying
to) avoid ;).
I can't imagine use-case when you need to filter something and you can do
it with (at least) server-side filter, and yet in this situation you want
to try to do it on the client-side... Doing filtering on clien
Yeah - just thought i'd point it out since people often have small tables
in their cluster alongside the big ones, and when generating reports,
sometimes you don't care if it finishes in 10 minutes vs an hour.
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 6:15 PM, Alex Baranau wrote:
> I think this is exactly what Chr
Hi Mohit,
For simple cases, it works for me for hbase 0.94 at least. But I'm not
sure it works for all features. I've never tried to run hbase unit
tests on windows for example.
N.
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 6:01 AM, Mohit Anchlia wrote:
> I am trying to run mini cluster using HBaseTestingUtility C
27 matches
Mail list logo
