Chris,
Thank you for the very descriptive update.
On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 6:29 PM, Chris Waterson wrote:
> Well, I upgraded to 0.92.2, since the version I was running on (0.92.1)
> didn't have those options for "hbck".
>
> That helped.
>
> It took me a while to realize that I had to make the roo
Well, I upgraded to 0.92.2, since the version I was running on (0.92.1) didn't
have those options for "hbck".
That helped.
It took me a while to realize that I had to make the root filesystem writable
so that "hbck
-repair" could create itself a directory. So, once that was done, it at least
can you run hbase hbck -fixMeta -fixAssignments
This should assign those region servers and fix the hole.
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 11:30 PM, Chris Waterson wrote:
> Hello! I've gotten myself into trouble where I'm missing files on HDFS
> that HBase thinks ought to be there. In particular, runni
Yes, checked in-between or monitored in parallel.
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 2:32 AM, Mesika, Asaf wrote:
> Yeah, I forgot to mention that important bit:
> the pair returned is always 0 on the firstKey and never changes.
>
> So if I understand you correctly, I need to use get AlterStatus between the
Ah alright. To rephrase my answer: Authentication in HBase via AD is
supported, but direct Authorization of tables via AD is not.
You'd need to either come up with your own co-processors or enhance
the AccessController to feed its ACL data off of LDAP instead of a
system table (a pluggable design
On region server web UI, you should see the list of coprocessors loaded.
But I guess you're looking for a programmatic way of detecting coprocessor
deployment.
Cheers
On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Mesika, Asaf wrote:
> 0.94.0
> On Dec 9, 2012, at 3:03 PM, yuzhih...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > Wh
Hello! I've gotten myself into trouble where I'm missing files on HDFS that
HBase thinks ought to be there. In particular, running "hbase hbck" yields the
below message: two regions are "not deployed on any region server" (because
there is no file in HDFS for the region), and "there is a hole
Hi Harsh,
HBase has a concept of ACL. But, these ACL's are maintained as another
system table "*_acl_*"(similar to Meta and Root) in HBase. See:
hbase.apache.org/book/hbase.accesscontrol.configuration.html.
Instead of HBase maintaining these ACL's as a system table we want HBase to
understand the
Hi to everyone here.
I'm working in a new product focused on Electronic Healthcare Records in
HBase and it would be nice to discuss
some design ideas with you. Have any of you done something seemed
before? If you have some good schema design examples, it would be nice
to use that knowledge.
T
Yeah, I forgot to mention that important bit:
the pair returned is always 0 on the firstKey and never changes.
So if I understand you correctly, I need to use get AlterStatus between the
modifyTable and enableTable ?
On Dec 9, 2012, at 10:53 PM, Harsh J wrote:
> Can you clarify on what "doesn't
Hi,
Correct me if I'm wrong, but HBase presently has no reliance on the
concept of groups, just users. For authenticating users, it relies on
Hadoop Common's security libraries, which is the same as is used by
HDFS for authentication. The Hadoop Common security libraries provided
auth_to_local for
Can you clarify on what "doesn't work" a bit more?
Do you get an exception or are you not receiving some data that you
are expecting?
AFAICT, this API is helpful for a parallel monitoring of an issued
schema update. In your code bits, which I will assume is serial, you
already disable-update-enab
Hi Harsh,
We are in process of installing a HBase cluster with a secure HDFS and
HBase. We already have a secure HDFS integrated with AD but we are still
trying to figure out a way to integrate HBase with AD(directly or
indirectly throgh KDC). I think my colleague has already implemented the
stuff
Hi,
I've tried using HBaseAdmin.getAlterStatus to check on a HBaseAdmin.modifyTable
command I've issued, but it doesn't work.
Sample Code:
Modifying Table
tableDescriptor = admin.getTableDescriptor(tableNameBytes);
if (tableDescriptor.hasCoprocessor(observerClass
0.94.0
On Dec 9, 2012, at 3:03 PM, yuzhih...@gmail.com wrote:
> Which hbase version are you targeting ?
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> On Dec 9, 2012, at 2:55 AM, "Mesika, Asaf" wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I wrote a custom Region Observer.
>> I'm currently writing an Installer class for it.
>> In this instal
Which hbase version are you targeting ?
Thanks
On Dec 9, 2012, at 2:55 AM, "Mesika, Asaf" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wrote a custom Region Observer.
> I'm currently writing an Installer class for it.
> In this installer I'm adding the region observer by adding a coprocessor to
> the HTableDescripto
Hi,
I wrote a custom Region Observer.
I'm currently writing an Installer class for it.
In this installer I'm adding the region observer by adding a coprocessor to the
HTableDescriptor, and then calling modifyTable by HBaseAdmin.
My question is: How can I check whether region observer was loaded
1) From these params young gc size is very low. Set the -Xmn with a higher
memory let's say 1g. if your data is short lived than long-lived then you can
try it making 2g or less.
2) Since -XX:SurvivorRatio is 8 here so both Survivors getting 1/8 of young
gc (i.e allocated to -Xmn). Have them
The scan are done in parallel in many region servers and are specific
to your query, so I don't think any jmx counter can help you.
Maybe you measure it using your own Region Observer on Pre/Post Scan,
and writing it to a shared log file on hdfs.
Sent from my iPhone
On 9 בדצמ 2012, at 04:41, Wei
So just to get this right: the class you have built is a custom Load
Balancer which replaces the default hbase load balancer implementation?
Sent from my iPhone
On 8 בדצמ 2012, at 05:33, Jean-Marc Spaggiari
wrote:
Hi,
Here is the situation.
I have an heterogeneous cluster with 2 cores CPUs, 4
Ok...
From a production/commercial grade answer...
With respect to HBase, you will have 1 live copy and 2 replications. (Assuming
you didn't change this.) So when you run against HBase, data locality becomes
less of an issue.
And again, you have to temper that with that it depends on the num
21 matches
Mail list logo
