Hello,
From the reference book 5.8.1.4. Put, if I issue a Put command without
specifying timestamp, the server will generate a TS for me! I wonder if the
server means the master node or regionservers? In my understanding, the
server means the regionserver, as the master will only tells the
ATT
yes, you are right. that is RS.
On Jul 13, 2013 4:22 PM, yonghu yongyong...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
From the reference book 5.8.1.4. Put, if I issue a Put command without
specifying timestamp, the server will generate a TS for me! I wonder if the
server means the master node or
My RS finally started without the strange ZK error, but regions are still
not moving...
Here is the new sample from RS log : http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=QJxs4chE
I can't see anything strange in the ZK's logs, just classical
connect/disconnect requests.
When should ZK nodes move from
Can you clarify your question a little bit ?
That is, are you expecting parallel scan within region boundary or across
boundaries ?
Cheers
On Jul 13, 2013, at 1:43 AM, ch huang justlo...@gmail.com wrote:
ATT
Take a look at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8259
Cheers
On Jul 13, 2013, at 4:04 AM, Adrien Mogenet adrien.moge...@gmail.com wrote:
My RS finally started without the strange ZK error, but regions are still
not moving...
Here is the new sample from RS log :
hi ted ,for example i have a table with 10 regions, if i offer the
condition hit the data of 8 regions,is it different do it use oraginal scan
and use coprocessor? i know coprocessor can do it parallel for each region
,but why the oraginal scan will slow than coprocessor?
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013
Have you read https://blogs.apache.org/hbase/entry/coprocessor_introduction?
Cheers
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 4:50 AM, ch huang justlo...@gmail.com wrote:
hi ted ,for example i have a table with 10 regions, if i offer the
condition hit the data of 8 regions,is it different do it use oraginal
I ment to ask if this type of compression is supported over RPC calls in
0.95?
On Saturday, July 13, 2013, Ted Yu wrote:
bq. Do you think prefix compression can also be utilized here?
In your use case, prefix compression would help in reducing bandwidth
consumption.
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013
Not yet, to my knowledge.
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 10:57 AM, Asaf Mesika asaf.mes...@gmail.com wrote:
I ment to ask if this type of compression is supported over RPC calls in
0.95?
On Saturday, July 13, 2013, Ted Yu wrote:
bq. Do you think prefix compression can also be utilized here?
10 matches
Mail list logo