Hi Dean
There is a patch attached in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6048 by Chunhui. Hope it
addresses your problem. Can you take a look at it and see if it is working
fine?
Regards
Ram
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 10:16 AM, ramkrishna vasudevan <
ramkrishna.s.vasude...@gmail.com> wro
Hi Dean
I mentioned those JIRAs to highlight the fact that the bug was open and it
was not fixed. I think better we fix this in 0.94 also, so that users
using this feature do not run into surprises. And we are sorry that the
feature that worked well for you in 0.92, did not work out in 0.94. It
Just notice that we are having a few meetups in case it has escaped your
notice. Check out http://www.meetup.com/hbaseusergroup/events/158491762/
(Mostly I'm posting because I messed up the date for the meeting next week.
I had it as the 31st when it should have been Thursday, the 30th. Please
Hi Ramkrishna,
I had taken the experimental label to mean "use at your own risk" when
the feature was released in 0.92. After some judicious testing in the
spirit of "use at your own risk", we found the feature worked well for
our use case. In 0.94, we had expected off-heap cache to be the s
I'm super happy to announce that the call for submissions for Berlin
Buzzwords 2013 is open. For those who don't know the conference - in
my "absolutely objective opinion" the event is the most exciting
conference on storing, processing and searching large amounts of
digital data for engineers.
Th
Can you tell us the HBase / hadoop versions you are working with ?
Thanks
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 7:18 AM, Neil Blue wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a unit test that uses HBaseTestingUtility to start a minicluster,
> create a table and run a map reduce job. But I have seen that when the job
> is su
Thats the manual I followed but there is nothing about configuring HBase on
top of HDFS HA.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-hbase.679495.n3.nabble.com/Hbase-Installation-on-top-of-HDFS-high-availability-tp4055067p4055135.html
Sent from the HBase User mailing list archive at Nabbl
Hello,
I have a unit test that uses HBaseTestingUtility to start a minicluster, create
a table and run a map reduce job. But I have seen that when the job is
submitted, it attempts to create a ClientProtocolProvider. The one it creates
is a LocalClientProtocolProvider.
The problem them comes l
I set the compaction policy to constant size and still, when compacting
bulk loaded regions, it splits the regions (the region's size is much
smaller than max file size but I do use compression...)
On Jan 23, 2014 12:11 PM, "Samir Ahmic" wrote:
> Hi Amit,
>
> Yes. You can set split policy per tab
Hi Amit,
Yes. You can set split policy per table. Here is relevant part of hbase
book:
http://hbase.apache.org/book/regions.arch.html
The policy can set globally through the HBaseConfiguration used or on a per
table basis:
HTableDescriptor myHtd = ...;
myHtd.setValue(HTableDescriptor.SPLIT_POLI
So I think my problem is that from 0.94 the default split policy
is: IncreasingToUpperBoundRegionSplitPolicy and
not ConstantSizeRegionSplitPolicy.
Can I set split policy per table ?
Still don't know if hbase.hregion.max.filesize relates to compressed or
uncompressed ?
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 7
11 matches
Mail list logo