Thanks Ashish. Above information is helpful.
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 9:19 PM, Ashish Singhi <
ashish.singhi.apa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This issue was reported and fixed as part of HBASE-12098.
> Fix is available in 0.98.7+ releases.
>
> Regards,
> Ashish Singhi
>
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 6:11 PM
Here is refined version:
http://pastebin.com/WXjYKmBG
Cheers
On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 2:57 AM, Ted Yu wrote:
> Dave:
> I wonder if Filter response can be enhanced in the following manner:
>
> http://pastebin.com/sb6apTPm
>
> My approach is based on using essential column family (column family A i
Hi Ted
we are using 0.96, so no hbase.hregion.percolumnfamilyflush.size.lower.bound
exists.
Besides these options, hbase.regionserver.optionalcacheflushinterval is
also related to flush memstore.
Thanks
Chang
On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 5:11 PM, Ted Yu wrote:
> Here're some other memstore related
Just thinking at loud :
"Cutting out the old store files could well also reduce disk IO for
that family by 100x."
What is "recent" for your data? More than 7 days? Or less? Don't you have
weekly major compactions? If so and if you are scanning for more than 7
days, then you will read the olde
Dave:
I wonder if Filter response can be enhanced in the following manner:
http://pastebin.com/sb6apTPm
My approach is based on using essential column family (column family A in
your case) to guide whether the remaining column families should be loaded.
To be specific, if outside the TimeRange yo