Re: Delete row that has columns with future timestamp

2016-06-27 Thread M. BagherEsmaeily
Yes, Major Compact is not my problem that is mentioned in the HBASE-10118, My problem is surviving row after delete even logically, And the row is still in the scanner result. I think the problem relates to timestamp of Delete object. When i set it to Long.MAX_VALUE (if you set no timestamp in

Does 1.2 support p999 metrics?

2016-06-27 Thread Tianying Chang
Hi, We want to expose p999 metrics for latency, e.g Get, Put, RPC latency. It seems it only support up to p99. Is p999 only supported after 1.3? If so, any patch to port into 1.2 to enable this? Thanks Tian-Ying

Re: Delete row that has columns with future timestamp

2016-06-27 Thread Ted Yu
HBASE-10118 was integrated into 0.98.2 The user was running 0.98.9 Hmm On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 12:05 PM, Dima Spivak wrote: > Hey M., > > Just to follow up on what JMS said, this was fixed in April 2014 (details > at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10118), so