+0/+1/+1/+1 (non-binding)
+0 on replacing `master` 1) because I don't have a strong opinion with any
terms.
-Stephen
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 1:26 PM Andrew Purtell wrote:
> If we were going to do this such that replacements for "master" land in
> HBase 4, then we should commit to doing it by
If we were going to do this such that replacements for "master" land in
HBase 4, then we should commit to doing it by 2021. That gives us
approximately six months. Contributors who feel this is a priority can do
the work on trunk and everyone else can continue as they like, with the
understanding t
I would like to make sure I am emphatically clear that "master" by itself
is not okay if the context is the same as what would normally be a
master/slave context. Furthermore our use of master is clearly such a
context.
It seems to me we have, broadly speaking, consensus around making *some*
chang
IMO, master is ok if not used with slave together.
-1/+1/+1/+1
-- --
??: "Andrew Purtell"https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/master
> for
> examples. In particular, the progression of an artisan was from
> "apprentice" to "journeyman" to "mast
