Re: [SURVEY] The current usage of favor node balancer across the community

We use FavoredStochasticBalancer, which by description says the same thing as FavoredNodeLoadBalancer. Ignoring that fact, problem appears to be favor node balancer is a problem, as it stores the favor node information > in hbase:meta. > Going a step back. Did we ever consider giving a thought

Re: [SURVEY] The current usage of favor node balancer across the community

On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 8:10 AM Mallikarjun wrote: > We use FavoredStochasticBalancer, which by description says the same thing > as FavoredNodeLoadBalancer. Ignoring that fact, problem appears to be > Does this work? > favor node balancer is a problem, as it stores the favor node informatio

Re: [SURVEY] The current usage of favor node balancer across the community

On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 12:30 PM Stack wrote: > On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 8:10 AM Mallikarjun > wrote: > >> We use FavoredStochasticBalancer, which by description says the same thing >> as FavoredNodeLoadBalancer. Ignoring that fact, problem appears to be >> >> > > Other concerns: > > * Hard-code

Re: [SURVEY] The current usage of favor node balancer across the community

Inline reply On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 1:03 AM Stack wrote: > On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 12:30 PM Stack wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 8:10 AM Mallikarjun > > wrote: > > > >> We use FavoredStochasticBalancer, which by description says the same > thing > >> as FavoredNodeLoadBalancer. Ignoring