We have a small use case for HBase but the data consumed by HBase is
growing in size comparable to the rest of the HDFS usage.
I noticed the hbase table TTL setting 5 days does not seem to be honored -
the data stays much longer or is never purged. The major compaction is set
for 7 days.
Any sugg
e of total heap memory size to
> > give to the cache (if < 1.0) OR, it is the total capacity in megabytes of
> > BucketCache. Default: 0.0
> >
> > If you specify the size as capacity, -XX:MaxDirectMemorySize should be
> > bigger than the capacity.
> >
> > Fo
y.
>
> For #2, did you encounter some error ?
>
> Cheers
>
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 8:52 AM, Arul Ramachandran
> wrote:
>
> > In HBase 1.1.2, I am setting up bucket cache. I set MaxDirectMemory size
> > greater than hbase.bucket.cache.size - only then it would wo
In HBase 1.1.2, I am setting up bucket cache. I set MaxDirectMemory size
greater than hbase.bucket.cache.size - only then it would work.
1) Does HBASE_REGIONSERVER_OPTS -XX:MaxDirectMemorySize needs to be greater
than hbase.bucket.cache.size?
2) It seems with hbase 1.1.2, HBASE_MASTER_OPTS also n
n 27, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Arul Ramachandran
> wrote:
>
> > Hello HBase folks,
> >
> >
> > - Looking to upgrade from Hortonworks HDP 2.1(Hadoop 2.4.0) to HDP 2.2.
> > (Hadoop 2.6.0)
> > - HBase version changes from 0.98.0 to 0.98.4
> >
> > Ar
Hello HBase folks,
- Looking to upgrade from Hortonworks HDP 2.1(Hadoop 2.4.0) to HDP 2.2.
(Hadoop 2.6.0)
- HBase version changes from 0.98.0 to 0.98.4
Are there any special steps involved for the HBase upgrade itself? From the
Hortonworks doc, I did not see specific step for this - other than
Has anyone migrated to HBase 1.1.1?
We plan to upgrade from HDP 2.1 HBase 0.98.0.2.1
to
HDP 2.3 HBase 1.1.1
http://hortonworks.com/hdp/whats-new/
What should I watch for?
Is HBase 1.1.1 considered production/stable?
or
would it be safe to upgrade to HDP 2.2 HBase 0.98.4?
If you have any in
Hello folks,
Hbase 0.96.1.2.0.6.1
We see the following behavior.
With append operation, data gets appended as expected until existing
regions are getting populated. But as soon as hbase does a split on one of
the region as it gets to its capacity, some of the append operations which
are already
r.stochastic.tableSkewCost"
> so that your table is more balanced.
>
> Cheers
>
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Arul Ramachandran
> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > HBase 0.96
> >
> > I notice couple of our tables are on only one of the region s
Hello,
HBase 0.96
I notice couple of our tables are on only one of the region servers and
that one is doing magnitudes of requests per sec compared to others.
Will setting hbase.master.loadbalance.bytable to true help this situation?
Also, if that is the case, wondering why this is not set to t
Hi Ted,
I don't have the load metrics at the moment... are you suggesting this
could be load related?
Thanks
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 5:34 PM, Ted Yu wrote:
> What was the load on rs3.world.com,60020,1414690096750 around 09:49:30 ?
>
> Cheers
>
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2
Hi,
Our Hbase application gets the following exception - HBase
0.96.1.2.0.6.1-101-hadoop2. I looked at the region server log and nothing
unusual is happening.
Any pointers on what else I can check? Thanks!
2014-11-16 09:49:37,686 WARN
[hbase-connection-shared-executor-pool644-t158]
AsyncProces
12 matches
Mail list logo
