Re: Dynamic load of Coprocessors

I believe there is a ticket relevant to your issue under current development. On 6/7/12 9:28 AM, "Marcos Ortiz" wrote: >You should see the explaination on the HBase´s book > >hbase.coprocessor.region.classes > >A comma-separated list of Coprocessors that are loaded by default on all >tables. Fo

Re: Dynamic load of Coprocessors

. Cheers, Keith On 6/7/12 9:44 AM, "Keith Wyss" wrote: >I believe there is a ticket relevant to your issue under current >development. > > >On 6/7/12 9:28 AM, "Marcos Ortiz" wrote: > >>You should see the explaination on the HBase´s book >> >>

Mixing Puts and Deletes in a single RPC

rt of performance overhead should I expect? Also, I've seen some Jira tickets about making this an atomic operation in its own right. Is that something that I can expect with CDH3U4? Thanks, Keith Wyss

Re: Mixing Puts and Deletes in a single RPC

Thanks for the info Ted, Anyone tackled this problem before 0.94? Keith On 7/5/12 2:28 PM, "Ted Yu" wrote: >Take a look at HBASE-3584: Allow atomic put/delete in one call >It is in 0.94, meaning it is not even in cdh4 > >Cheers > >On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 11:19 AM,

Re: Mixing Puts and Deletes in a single RPC

ch of these. It is my impression that >>>this >>> shouldn't appreciably increase network traffic as the RPC calls will be >>> bundled. >>> >>> Has anyone else addressed this problem? Does this seem like a >>>reasonable >>> approach? >>> What sort of performance overhead should I expect? >>> >>> Also, I've seen some Jira tickets about making this an atomic >>>operation in >>> its own right. Is that something that >>> I can expect with CDH3U4? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Keith Wyss >>> > >